Teams

SLKHA-Haynes/CSD 18+ 4.5 S

Lake USTA 18 & Over Summer Singles · 4.5 Men Wed PM 18+ Singles

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesChet Kristy vs Jesus Espinoza1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Jackson Davis7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs SLLAY-Ayala/CSD LAKEWon 30
W#1 SinglesChet Kristy vs Vamsi Chintalapati6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichael Dedmond vs Pete Eakin6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Sean Gallagher6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Jon Schrand7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBenjamin Keeney vs Michael Kearney3-6, 2-6
2026-07-08vs SLLAY-Ayala/CSD LAKEWon 20
W#1 SinglesChet Kristy vs Vaughn Schmutz6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Keeney vs LUIS AYALA6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Jesus Espinoza1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Jackson Davis5-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Keeney vs Devon Martin6-0, 6-0
2026-06-17vs SLLAY-Ayala/CSD LAKESplit 11
W#1 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Pete Eakin6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Sean Gallagher4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJoel Reiter vs Jesus Espinoza2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAndrew Kutsch vs Jackson Davis6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMichael Dedmond vs Michael Kearney6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men Wed PM 18+ Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SLJSC-Schrand/River Run 18+ Singles 4.56215919165
2SLLAY-Ayala/CSD LAKE35101428195
3SLKHA-Haynes/CSD 18+ 4.5 S35111329227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Chet Kristy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Benjamin Keeney
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Andrew Kutsch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Joel Reiter
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.12
Michael Dedmond
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chet Kristy + Benjamin Keeney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chet Kristy
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Benjamin Keeney
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrew Kutsch
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Joel Reiter
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
4.18
Michael Dedmond
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.