Teams

UPTA55A/Buturff/Spindletree

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs UPTA55A/Kent/SportsclubWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Koban / John Moss vs Dick Kilpatrick / Matt Kowalec6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Buturff / Jessy Grasso vs Richard Falciatano / Cesar Manent6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeff Mooneyhan / Ryan Forbes vs Richard Ameris / Robert Cromley1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-08vs UPTA55A/Hollister/ReserveWon 21
L#1 DoublesDouglas Koban / John Moss vs Greg Lewis / Craig Hartman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Buturff / Jessy Grasso vs Mark Apsey / Hugh Hollister6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHamilton Altstatt / Jeff Mooneyhan vs Mikell Perry / Brian Evanski6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Douglas Koban
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Jeff Buturff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
John Moss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jessy Grasso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jeff Mooneyhan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Hamilton Altstatt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Ryan Forbes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Craig Wells
published 3.5
James Juras
published 3.5
Randall Mahan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessy Grasso + Jeff Buturff9362% games+2.4% vs expected
John Moss + Douglas Koban7258% games−2.9% vs expected
Jeff Mooneyhan + Hamilton Altstatt224 matchesnot enough data
Hamilton Altstatt + Douglas Koban314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Douglas Koban
29W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Jeff Buturff
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
John Moss
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jessy Grasso
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jeff Mooneyhan
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Hamilton Altstatt
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Ryan Forbes
16W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Craig Wells
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
James Juras
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randall Mahan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.