Teams

GJTC CKOHLS

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - WS

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-20vs GJTC LERVENWon 30
W#1 SinglesCarla Kohls vs Amanda Grimsley6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTina Hulihee / Danielle Martens vs Leslie Erven / Carol Serrano6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Decoursey / Angie Vance vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-12vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 02
L#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs Lisa Poudrier6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Kohls / Tina Hulihee vs Kelley Henke / Kathy Daniels3-6, 3-6
2021-07-05vs GJTC LERVENWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarla Kohls / Lisa Smith vs Karen Bowman / Carol Serrano6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Decoursey / Danielle Martens vs Jennifer Watson / Dana Elliott6-2, 6-1
2021-06-30vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 03
L#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs Jennie Aubert5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarla Kohls / Carrie Thornton vs Tammy Hopkins / Denise Faber3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Hulihee / Kimberly Arthurs vs Christy Fry / Lisa Poudrier1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-06-23vs GJTC LERVENWon 21
L#1 SinglesCarla Kohls vs Jennifer Watson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Arthurs / Tina Hulihee vs Karen Bowman / Ann Ensley6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Thornton / Erin Decoursey vs Leslie Erven / Carol Serrano7-5, 6-4
2021-06-21vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Hulihee / Lisa Smith vs Kathy Daniels / Kelley Henke1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarla Kohls / Angie Vance vs Heather Hughes / Tracy Hughes0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Arthurs / Erin Decoursey vs Denise Faber / Lisa Sharp0-6, 2-6
2021-06-14vs GJTC LERVENWon 20
W#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina Hulihee / Erin Decoursey vs Karen Bowman / Amanda Grimsley6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-09vs GJTC WPOMRENKELost 03
L#1 SinglesDanielle Martens vs Jennie Aubert7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Arthurs / Angie Vance vs Tracy Hughes / Heather Hughes3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Kohls / Erin Decoursey vs Christy Fry / Stacey Hayward3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Danielle Martens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
DIANE GRIFFITHS
published 4
3.69
Carrie Thornton
published 4
3.68
Angie Vance
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Tina Hulihee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Erin Decoursey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Carla Kohls
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
Kimberly Arthurs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Kohls + Angie Vance141449% games−1.8% vs expected
Carla Kohls + Erin Decoursey0542% gamesnot enough data
Angie Vance + Erin Decoursey224 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Thornton + DIANE GRIFFITHS213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Decoursey + Tina Hulihee213 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Martens + Tina Hulihee123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Martens
62W–42L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
DIANE GRIFFITHS
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carrie Thornton
60W–57L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Angie Vance
36W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Tina Hulihee
72W–92L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Erin Decoursey
43W–56L career · 6 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Carla Kohls
87W–150L career · 7 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
Kimberly Arthurs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.