Teams

SD HT Pacific Beach TC/ Eade

2025 Mixed Doubles Tri-Level Fall - SD · SD HT (9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-30vs SD HT Peninsula TC/ SimmonsLost 01
L#1 DoublesHillary Park / Joseph King vs Lorenzo Herrera / Cynthia Herrera4-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs SD LLW HT Balboa TC/ MartinezLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph King / Hillary Park vs Madalyn Moore / Charlie Stephens4-6, 1-6
2025-10-11vs SD HT SDTRC/ GinterLost 01
L#2 DoublesHillary Park / Timothy Searcy vs Soledad Ramirez / Eric Dahms6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs SD HT Balboa TC/ DemkoWon 10
W#1 DoublesHillary Park / Lucas Heilman vs Will Garber / Fabiola Flores6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD HT (9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Hillary Park
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.10
Ashley Jay
published 4.5
4.09
Arianna Michaels
published 4.5
3.88
Teppei Karasawa
published 4
Ashk Nazeri
published 4
3.71
Oliver Thieler
published
3.70
Sarah Eade
published
3.68
Will Mauriz
published
3.40
Christina Beppu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Daisuke Beppu
published 3.5
2.97
Christiana Thieler
published 3.5
Lucas Heilman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daisuke Beppu + Christina Beppu9072% gamesnot enough data
Hillary Park + Lucas Heilman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hillary Park
67W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Ashley Jay
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.10
4.5
Arianna Michaels
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Teppei Karasawa
64W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Ashk Nazeri
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Oliver Thieler
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Sarah Eade
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Will Mauriz
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Christina Beppu
70W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Daisuke Beppu
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christiana Thieler
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lucas Heilman
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.