Teams

Willy's:Bisceglia:Bisceglia

2023 Cape Adult 65 & Over Men · 7.0 Men Flt 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-29vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Holcombe / Vincent Viscuso vs Tom Scotten / Brian Garner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeorge Lehner / David Kenney vs Jon Porkka / Ken Pedicini3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Dugan / Chad Small vs Peter Conathan / Wendell Anderson2-6, 2-6
2023-06-24vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Gauthier / William Holcombe vs Jon Porkka / Ken Pedicini6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Weinman / George Lehner vs Brian Garner / Greg Stone6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Bisceglia / Chad Small vs Peter Conathan / Wendell Anderson3-6, 1-6
2023-06-22vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Bisceglia / John Gauthier vs George Vozeolas / Greg Stone6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGeorge Lehner / Peter Weinman vs Peter Conathan / David Riddle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVincent Viscuso / Chad Small vs Robert Majewski / Charles Mueller6-4, 6-1
2023-06-17vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarc Simon / David Kenney vs Jonathan Hagenstein / Greg Stone1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Gauthier / Paul Napoli vs Brian Garner / Tom Scotten4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeter Weinman / George Lehner vs Jon Porkka / Roy Heffernan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-10vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Williams / John Gauthier vs David Riddle / Greg Stone3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Lehner / Peter Weinman vs Roy Heffernan / Brian Garner4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJim Bisceglia / Paul Napoli vs Peter Conathan / Jonathan Hagenstein4-6, 0-6
2023-06-01vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiLost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Williams / John Gauthier vs Tom Scotten / Brian Garner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Holcombe / Vincent Viscuso vs Robert Majewski / Greg Stone4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJim Bisceglia / Bill Dugan vs Matthew Pernick / Ken Pedicini5-7, 1-6
2023-05-25vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesJim Bisceglia / Steven Williams vs Matthew Pernick / Brian Garner4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Lehner / Peter Weinman vs Roy Heffernan / George Vozeolas7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Gauthier / William Holcombe vs Kevin Joyce / Peter Conathan6-2, 6-0
2023-05-20vs MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/MajewskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesPeter Weinman / George Lehner vs Brian Garner / Tom Scotten4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJim Bisceglia / Steven Williams vs Matthew Pernick / Kevin Joyce6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Gauthier / Paul Napoli vs Jonathan Hagenstein / Peter Conathan7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men Flt 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Willy's:Bisceglia:Bisceglia53141026198
2MCAC:Pernick:Pernick/Majewski35101431230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Chad Small
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bill Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Kenney
published 3.5
3.18
George Lehner
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Jim Bisceglia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Gauthier
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Marc Simon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Napoli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peter Weinman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Steven Williams
published
Vincent Viscuso
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
William Holcombe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gauthier + Peter Weinman8557% gamesnot enough data
George Lehner + Peter Weinman7456% gamesnot enough data
Paul Napoli + Vincent Viscuso6168% gamesnot enough data
John Gauthier + Jim Bisceglia3445% gamesnot enough data
David Kenney + Jim Bisceglia5256% gamesnot enough data
Paul Napoli + Jim Bisceglia3259% gamesnot enough data
Chad Small + Peter Weinman5082% gamesnot enough data
Marc Simon + Peter Weinman3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chad Small
31W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Bill Dugan
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Kenney
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
George Lehner
28W–18L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Jim Bisceglia
62W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Gauthier
69W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marc Simon
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Paul Napoli
105W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Weinman
157W–80L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Williams
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vincent Viscuso
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
William Holcombe
42W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.