Teams

Sonterra Select

2025 Tri-Level League · Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.57 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-11vs Nett NutzLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Miller / John Mansfield vs Carl Bain / Landon Blair1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Wilkinson / Kurt Stricker vs Anil Devireddy / Sebastian Padilla6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKent Kirkman / Shiva Sandrana vs Ariel Canonizado / Brian Chase6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Reagan Meredith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Daniel Seale
published 4
Bill Barkley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniel Coffey
published 4
3.50
Will Alston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Daniel Estrella
published 3.5
3.47
Shawn Connolly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Kurt Stricker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Mike Wilkinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Darren Engh
published 3.5
3.34
Kent Power
published
3.20
JORGE PEREZ
published 3
3.20
Kent Kirkman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jeremy Bergeron
published
3.07
Shiva Sandrana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
2.84
Patricio E Gonzalez
published
John Mansfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reagan Meredith
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Daniel Seale
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bill Barkley
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Daniel Coffey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Alston
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Estrella
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Shawn Connolly
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kurt Stricker
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
Mike Wilkinson
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Darren Engh
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kent Power
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.34
3
JORGE PEREZ
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.20
Kent Kirkman
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.20
Jeremy Bergeron
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.16
Shiva Sandrana
6W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Freddie Hernandez
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Patricio E Gonzalez
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.84
John Mansfield
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.