Teams

KY/LEX/McGuire

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 2.5 Men (Session 2)

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-21vs KY/LEX/Fox Session 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCorey Forester / Bryan Rone vs David Bupte / Theodore Swansegar1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJustin Morgan vs Sean Fox4-6, 2-6
2026-05-01vs KY/LEX/Fox Session 2Split 11
W#1 DoublesBryan Rone / Gaoda Jiang vs Theodore Swansegar / Maher Sarieh1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSeth Parker vs David Bupte0-6, 0-6
2026-04-14vs KY/LEX/Fox Session 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCorey Forester / Bryan Rone vs Maher Sarieh / Theodore Swansegar2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJustin Morgan vs David Bupte3-6, 2-6
2026-04-02vs KY/LEX/Fox Session 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRichie Lane / Matthew Taulbee vs Sean Fox / David Bupte6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCorey Forester / Bryan Rone vs Theodore Swansegar / Maher Sarieh1-6, 4-6
2026-03-24vs KY/LEX/Fox Session 2Split 11
W#1 DoublesRichie Lane / Matthew Taulbee vs Theodore Swansegar / Maher Sarieh7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGaoda Jiang vs David Bupte0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Men (Session 2)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Fox Session 2419614106
2KY/LEX/McGuire146919122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Justin Morgan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.05
Bryan Rone
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.99
Corey Forester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Gaoda Jiang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Matthew Taulbee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richie Lane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Seth Parker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tara Swan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Rone + Corey Forester033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Morgan
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
2.5
Bryan Rone
1W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Corey Forester
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Gaoda Jiang
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Taulbee
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richie Lane
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Seth Parker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tara Swan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.