Teams

Istre/18/6.5/CM/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 LC (18&O) Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 6 12:30 PM
Graywood Golf & Racquet Club
Sep 13 3:30 PM
Graywood Golf & Racquet Club
Sep 29 6:00 PM
Ward 3 Recreation Tennis Complex
Oct 18 5:00 PM
Graywood Golf & Racquet Club
2026-08-23vs Meaux/18/6.5/CM/LCRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJuan Molina Gonzalez / Andrew Kohler vs Gray Standing / Jeffrey Davis6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKevin Chaumont / Bransen Stout vs Adam Zayor / Zachariah Burns6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJacob Istre / Brett Carlisle vs Derrick Thibodeaux / Tyler Daigle5-7, 5-7
2026-08-16vs Beaugh/18/6.5/CM/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLance Thomas / Andrew Kohler vs Paul Gonsoulin / Sam Smith6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPeter Gover / Scott Ogden vs Matthew Morris / Jandre Rademeyer6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKevin Chaumont / Hunter Keller vs Ethan Johnson / Matt Beaugh2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.5 LC (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Istre/18/6.5/CM/LCRC1021220
2Beaugh/18/6.5/CM/LCRC1142446
3Meaux/18/6.5/CM/LCRC0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Juan Molina Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Peter Gover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jeremy Istre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Lance Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Scott Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Patrick Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Andrew Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Hunter Keller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Bransen Stout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Brett Carlisle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jacob Istre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Chaumont
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Molina Gonzalez + Scott Ogden404 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Kohler + Peter Gover303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Molina Gonzalez
19W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Peter Gover
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.38
Jeremy Istre
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
Lance Thomas
22W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Scott Ogden
22W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Patrick Hale
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Andrew Kohler
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Hunter Keller
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Bransen Stout
8W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Brett Carlisle
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Jacob Istre
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Chaumont
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.