Teams

Buckhorn Aces - S. Mosher

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Anne Orwa1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDaisy Vasquez / Helene Daniel vs Claudia Chao / Danna Sturman6-4, 6-1
2022-03-01vs Hills/Tonnu - HG Mixed NutsWon 20
W#1 DoublesHelene Daniel / Daisy Vasquez vs Cristiane Fogaca / Elizabeth Dasilva2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Jihea Helme6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Lauren Jensen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaisy Vasquez / Helene Daniel vs Dorothy Flair / Juanita Vila6-3, 6-0
2022-02-18vs Cheval Smashionistas - J. UrbanLost 01
L#1 DoublesHelene Daniel / Daisy Vasquez vs Jacqueline Hayes / Danielle Lindblom5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-02-15vs PC Berry Ballers - J. WyckoffSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaisy Vasquez / Helene Daniel vs Debra Lowe / Gabrielle Legeay1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Zoila Vidal6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Jennifer Carlson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaisy Vasquez / Helene Daniel vs Kate Walshcalton / Laura Long6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaisy Vasquez / Helene Daniel vs Jane Shouppe / Irma Gill5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Daffern vs Marieglory Quinones6-3, 7-5
2022-01-18vs Avila - M. MillikenLost 01
L#2 DoublesHelene Daniel / Daisy Vasquez vs Giliane Rifai / Yeon Thomas3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Dionesia Ibanez
published 3.5
2.83
Daisy Vasquez
published 3
2.82
Susan MOSHER
published
2.81
Helene Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Brittany Atkins
published 3
2.68
Kristin Daffern
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Carol Garcia
published 3
2.54
Renee Rasmussen
published
Marina Parisi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helene Daniel + Daisy Vasquez134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dionesia Ibanez
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3
Daisy Vasquez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Helene Daniel
72W–56L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Brittany Atkins
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Daffern
58W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Carol Garcia
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57
Renee Rasmussen
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Marina Parisi
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.