Teams

Teays Valley Hess

2026 OH OV Tri-Level Charleston · Summer 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs YMCA BlountWon 20
W#2 DoublesScott Graham / Steven Thorne vs Shad Blount / Michael Edens3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDustin Bach / Jason Hunter vs Brandon Steele / L Cochran4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-08vs YMCA BlountSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTanner Whipkey / Brian McCutcheon vs Anoop Bhasin / Eli Blount6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesOtmer Elmore / Leo Segal vs Michael Edens / Richard Pickens7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs YMCA BlountLost 12
W#1 DoublesGrant Knapp / Matthew Sutton vs Eli Blount / Anoop Bhasin6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSteven Thorne / Otmer Elmore vs Shad Blount / Michael Edens6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlex Moscatello / Dana Eddy vs L Cochran / Mark Sundstrom1-6, 2-6
2026-06-23vs YMCA BlountWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrant Knapp / Tanner Whipkey vs Eli Blount / Michael Kawash6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesScott Graham / Leo Segal vs Richard Pickens / Shad Blount6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDustin Bach / Dana Eddy vs Brandon Steele / Mark Sundstrom3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-10vs YMCA BlountWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian McCutcheon / Matthew Sutton vs Eli Blount / Michael Kawash7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesScott Graham / Otmer Elmore vs Michael Edens / Shad Blount6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDustin Bach / Nicholas Shank vs L Cochran / Brandon Steele6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Brian McCutcheon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Tanner Whipkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Matthew Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Grant Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Steven Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Otmer Elmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Dustin Bach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Dana Eddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Jason Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Leo Segal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Graham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Graham + Steven Thorne2348% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Sutton + Tanner Whipkey4163% gamesnot enough data
Dustin Bach + Dana Eddy2349% gamesnot enough data
Steven Thorne + Dana Eddy314 matchesnot enough data
Brian McCutcheon + Otmer Elmore303 matchesnot enough data
Brian McCutcheon + Tanner Whipkey123 matchesnot enough data
Scott Graham + Dana Eddy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian McCutcheon
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Tanner Whipkey
46W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
Matthew Sutton
60W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Grant Knapp
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Steven Thorne
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
Otmer Elmore
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Dustin Bach
26W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Dana Eddy
39W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jason Hunter
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Leo Segal
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Scott Graham
26W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.