Teams

DHenley-HVCC

2025 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-07vs KRamaswamy40-DURWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Alex Herzick vs Kiran Ramaswamy / Shiv Giri6-4, 6-4
2025-10-06vs CRoessler-HRWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Alex Herzick vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Andrew Curso4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-22vs JByrd40-DURLost 01
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Perry / Justin Nixon vs Youngjun Lee / Edward Bernier2-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs AHanda-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Benjamin Perry vs Zachary Osofsky / Scott Williams6-4, 6-1
2025-08-18vs DBaddour-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJustin Nixon / Benjamin Feldman vs Brian Jenkins / Robert Hutchins7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-17vs CRoessler-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Nixon / Paul Klenk vs Adam Lang / Lance Long6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Justin Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.76
Bayard Collins
published 4
3.71
Andrew Sheldon
published 4
3.68
3.67
Bryson Powell
published 4
3.66
Benjamin Perry
published 4
3.61
RICHARD GRIFFIN
published
3.59
Alex Herzick
published 3.5
3.56
Sean Selig
published
3.48
Paul Klenk
published
3.35
John Burkert
published
3.23
Benjamin Feldman
published 3.5
Walker Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Nixon + Alex Herzick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Justin Nixon
43W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Bayard Collins
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Andrew Sheldon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Christopher Lascola
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Bryson Powell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Benjamin Perry
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
RICHARD GRIFFIN
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Alex Herzick
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Sean Selig
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Paul Klenk
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
John Burkert
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Benjamin Feldman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Walker Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.