Teams

G.Jimenez

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-13vs I.Pataki 18+ 4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesGabe Jimenez / Carlos Collado vs Daniel Breazeale / Carlos Rodriguez4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Geoff Knight6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Parsons / Brian Soltz vs Mark Stephenson / Aaron Vedder5-7, 4-6
2023-05-07vs D.TranSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Parsons / Brian Soltz vs Mark Combs / Scott McElreath3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Chirag Patel6-2, 6-0
2023-04-23vs J.Cannon CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoshua Collins / Gabe Jimenez vs Jeffrey Nottingham / Paxton Badham4-6, 2-6
2023-04-19Split 11
L#2 DoublesPete Vammino / Brian Soltz vs Kelly Burke / Patrick Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16vs T.Muncie 4.0 18Split 11
L#2 SinglesPedro Loaiza vs Joshua Leon6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Soltz / John Parsons vs William Caldwell / Michael Stellar6-1, 6-1
2023-03-19vs M.JamesWon 21
L#1 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs Spencer Johnson3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesPedro Loaiza vs Tevin Wilson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Parsons / Brian Soltz vs Nick Doyle / Tyler Paul6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Daniel Martchek
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Carlos Collado
published 4
3.80
Pedro Loaiza
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.80
David Rowe
published 4
3.72
Brian Rigney
published 4
3.61
Gabe Jimenez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.57
Brian Soltz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Pete Vammino
published
3.14
Ben Barnhill
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Soltz + Pedro Loaiza7648% gamesnot enough data
Gabe Jimenez + Brian Soltz1544% gamesnot enough data
Gabe Jimenez + Pedro Loaiza3346% gamesnot enough data
Gabe Jimenez + Carlos Collado224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Carlos Collado
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Pedro Loaiza
91W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
David Rowe
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Brian Rigney
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Gabe Jimenez
65W–104L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Brian Soltz
56W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Pete Vammino
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Ben Barnhill
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.