Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 18AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angie Esswein
published 4.5
Bec Heinrich
published 4.5
4.23
Seena Shanker
published
4.21
Kiran F Narsinh
published
4.07
Julia Porter
published
4.00
Jill Schepmann
published
3.98
Katherine Dowling
published
3.95
Flor Salinas
published
3.93
Tricia Jacob
published
3.92
Nancy Wilson
published
3.89
Caitlin Finnell
published 4.5
3.88
Kelsey Palmer
published
3.87
Euna Roh
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Jill Van Slyke
published
3.76
Nina Shetty
published
3.75
Shin Koo
published
Alexandra Kahn
published 4
3.67
Alison Ferrer
published 4
3.65
Ashley Bernstein
published 4
3.62
Christina Tse
published 4
2.96
Somi Lim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Euna Roh + Somi Lim314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Wilson + Jill Van Slyke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Esswein
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Bec Heinrich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Seena Shanker
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Kiran F Narsinh
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.21
Julia Porter
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Jill Schepmann
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Katherine Dowling
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Flor Salinas
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Tricia Jacob
29W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Nancy Wilson
21W–28L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.92
4.5
Caitlin Finnell
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.89
Kelsey Palmer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Euna Roh
23W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.79
Nina Shetty
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Shin Koo
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.75
4
Alexandra Kahn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alison Ferrer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Ashley Bernstein
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Christina Tse
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Somi Lim
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.