Teams

BMT 2.0 - Sharrar

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-14vs Burkwood 5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Flynn / Jason Walek vs Andrew Powell / Brandon Malone1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Noonan / Edward Barlow vs Andrew Hylton / Dylan Forlines3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Sharrar / Patrick Lloyd vs Michael Jernigan / Scott Childs1-6, 2-6
2025-09-06vs Burkwood 5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStan Craig / Stephen Demella vs Andrew Powell / Brandon Malone4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Weiland / Jeff Weaver vs Andrew Hylton / Brendon Albon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Dober / Patrick Lloyd vs Adam Tuck / Scott Childs1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-09-03vs Mercurio Chestnut Oaks 5.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesErik Ringberg / Jason Walek vs Adonis Salinas / Marshall Powell6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Weiland / Stephen Demella vs Elamaran Anbalagan / Douglas Lines6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Sharrar / Ricky Wong vs Sam Taylor / Michael Elander6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-23vs ACAC NaputiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Flynn / Jason Walek vs TJ Rhone / Thomas Tirrell5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRobert Allen / Craig Dober vs Peter Olson / Parker Ward6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRicky Wong / Christopher Alwine vs Nima Jadidi / Gary Berg7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-17vs Avalon-WagnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Weiland / Stephen Demella vs Eric Zimmerman / Istvan Godri Martis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Dober / Jeff Weaver vs Kevin Price / Kevin Terminella6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Lloyd / Christopher Alwine vs Joseph Piwowarski / Adam Terminella1-6, 1-6
2025-08-09vs Willow Oaks FranksWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Weiland / Stephen Demella vs Jim Kennedy / Greg Dinardo6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJason Walek / Erik Ringberg vs Jonathan Stalls / Andrew Salp6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEdward Barlow / Philip Noonan vs Byron Chafin / Kevin McQueen7-5, 6-3
2025-08-03vs MAC BiddleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Flynn / Jason Walek vs Joseph Gault / Zack Griffith6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdward Barlow / Erik Ringberg vs Greg Chadwick / Lawrence Golixer6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Demella / Patrick Lloyd vs RAVI KALKUNTE / Andrew Biddle5-7, 2-6
2025-07-26vs SCC PercyLost 12
W#1 DoublesCraig Dober / Stephen Demella vs Dan Stembridge / Justin Appelbee7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Noonan / Robert Allen vs Michael Hyatt / David Percy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Sharrar / Jeff Weaver vs Courtenay Beebe / John Troy Owens6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Michael Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Craig Dober
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.92
Erik Ringberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
John Weiland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Philip Noonan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
David Sharrar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jeff Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Stephen Demella
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.70
Jason Walek
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Christopher Alwine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Edward Barlow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Patrick Lloyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Ricky Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Craig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Ringberg + Craig Dober4166% gamesnot enough data
Michael Flynn + Jason Walek033 matchesnot enough data
Philip Noonan + Christopher Alwine213 matchesnot enough data
John Weiland + Stephen Demella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Flynn
41W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3
Craig Dober
27W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Erik Ringberg
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
John Weiland
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Philip Noonan
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
David Sharrar
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Jeff Weaver
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Stephen Demella
23W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jason Walek
22W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Christopher Alwine
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Edward Barlow
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Patrick Lloyd
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Ricky Wong
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Stan Craig
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.