Teams

BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Maureen Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Melissa Scheeline
published
3.63
Monica Goren
published
3.62
Adele Anfinson
published 4
3.59
Sue Weiss
published
3.51
Melissa Vincelette
published
3.49
Monica Manuilow
published
3.48
Catherine Lacey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Amelia Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lisa Bridges
published
3.44
Caroline Bruister
published 3.5
3.38
Alexandra Wlassowsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Katherine Alevizos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Janine Rogers
published
3.29
Leilani Latimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Monica Reid
published
3.08
Tonia Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lummi Bae
published
3.06
Corey Stodolnic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.66
Kathryn Supinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandy Shepherd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Morris + Monica Manuilow134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Sampson
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Melissa Scheeline
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Monica Goren
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Adele Anfinson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Sue Weiss
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Melissa Vincelette
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Monica Manuilow
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Catherine Lacey
0W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Amelia Morris
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Lisa Bridges
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Caroline Bruister
16W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Alexandra Wlassowsky
16W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Katherine Alevizos
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Janine Rogers
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Leilani Latimer
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Monica Reid
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Tonia Rhoads
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.08
Lummi Bae
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Corey Stodolnic
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kathryn Supinski
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.66
Sandy Shepherd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.