Teams

Fisher - Highland Country Club

Sandhills Combo 55 & Over · 8.5 Combo 55 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Highland Country Club
Sep 27 3:00 PM
Country Club of North Carolina
Oct 4 3:00 PM
Highland Country Club
2026-08-30vs Stevens - CCNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Fisher / Emily Schaefer vs Elizabeth Hasty / Kathy Channell7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristina McKenzie / Andrea Tatman vs Cindy Goodman / Ellen Tarry1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Tatum / Amy Perko vs Christy Clark / Frances Morris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-23vs Stevens - CCNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Fisher / Emily Schaefer vs Julie Dodd / Elizabeth Hasty6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Yarborough / Megan Mannell vs Ellen Tarry / Cindy Goodman1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Perko / Catherine Christianson vs Christy Clark / Elaine van Vliet6-2, 6-1
2026-08-16vs Stevens - CCNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Fisher / Megan Mannell vs Christy Clark / ELIZABETH BODE6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Perko / Catherine Christianson vs Ellen Tarry / Cindy Goodman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Schaefer / Tammy Batten vs Frances Morris / Michelle Porter0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.5 Combo 55 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fisher - Highland Country Club1021430

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Emily Schaefer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.22
Christina McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Amy Perko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Megan Mannell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Marian Boyette
published
3.85
Kensley Edge
published 4.5
3.82
Kimberly Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Andrea Tatman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Laura Yarborough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Catherine Christianson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Susan Edmonds
published
3.69
Mary Tatum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Tammy Batten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Tatman + Laura Yarborough5056% games+0.6% vs expected
Susan Edmonds + Kimberly Fisher7751% gamesnot enough data
Laura Yarborough + Kensley Edge6257% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Fisher + Kensley Edge2354% gamesnot enough data
Amy Perko + Catherine Christianson314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Catherine Christianson314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Fisher + Megan Mannell224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Mannell + Laura Yarborough314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Schaefer
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
4.42
4.5
Christina McKenzie
50W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Amy Perko
20W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
Megan Mannell
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
Marian Boyette
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.94
4.5
Kensley Edge
35W–37L career · no lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.85
Kimberly Fisher
33W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Andrea Tatman
77W–64L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Laura Yarborough
48W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Catherine Christianson
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Susan Edmonds
34W–30L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Mary Tatum
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Tammy Batten
52W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.