Teams

Sportime LI: Aceholes

2025 18&Over Women Day Winter · 4.0 Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-03vs TIA: Tennis Inspired Athletes 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Hommel / Carolyne Rainero vs Amanda Bryan / Sara Watts0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Miran Robarts vs Carole Allers / Lori Calat2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Hiam / Paola Michel vs Kaisa Elovaara / Yvette Gong3-6, 3-6
2025-03-27vs NRRC: Served HotLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Jessica Pearson vs Rebecca Dvorkin / Julia McMillan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Chang / Michele McInerney vs Annie Berger / Olga Orgielewicz5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPaisley Kelling / Paola Michel vs Jennifer Marsh / Francine Pollack6-7, 5-2
2025-03-04vs Tennis Club of Hastings: ZarbaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Jessica Pearson vs Kimberly Kraus / Lisa Lubart7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathryn Hommel / Carolyne Rainero vs Faith Ackerman / Shannon Weber6-0, 6-4
2025-02-27vs Tennis Club of Hastings: ZarbaLost 12
L#1 DoublesElaine Chang / Carolyne Rainero vs Danielle Herbst / Bret Sommer0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMiran Robarts / Kathryn Biggs vs Laura Zarba / Faith Ackerman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaola Michel / Joan Hiam vs Suzanne Sullivan / Ali Miller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-13vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyne Rainero / Elaine Chang vs Ruth Libin / Rita Lieberman7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJessica Pearson / Jill Isenbarger vs Mona Swanson / Susan Silver Schlecker5-7, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hommel / Michele McInerney vs Stephanie O'Sullivan / Patricia Gamba6-2, 6-4
2025-02-06vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Pearson / Miran Robarts vs Allison Gibbs / Casey Rosenblum1-6, 4-6
2025-01-24vs MTDZ: Match MakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Kathryn Hommel vs Sharon Ho / Jennifer Chan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Isenbarger / Margo Coble vs Elizabeth Sipprelle / Mariko Abdel-Rahman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichele McInerney / Elaine Chang vs Ayako Tsukamoto / Chizu Mendoza6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-10vs Rye Racquet Club: Honey DeucesWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Hommel / Jessica Pearson vs Wendy Hyer / Victoria Maggard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarolyne Rainero / Elaine Chang vs Ali Campbell / Christy Schultze3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicole Burgess / Laura Powers vs Amy Kaufman / Andrea Hessekiel6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Carolyne Rainero
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Margo Coble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Kathryn Hommel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.67
Nicole Burgess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Kathryn Biggs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Miran Robarts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Elaine Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Michele McInerney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Jessica Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Jill Isenbarger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Joan Hiam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Laura Powers
published
Paisley Kelling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paola Michel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyne Rainero + Jessica Pearson7561% games+9.8% vs expected
Kathryn Hommel + Margo Coble6253% games+9.7% vs expected
Carolyne Rainero + Kathryn Hommel13758% games+6.4% vs expected
Jill Isenbarger + Margo Coble432258% games+6.4% vs expected
Paola Michel + Paisley Kelling3447% games+6.3% vs expected
Elaine Chang + Jessica Pearson7355% games+6.2% vs expected
Jessica Pearson + Margo Coble4262% games+4.2% vs expected
Elaine Chang + Kathryn Hommel4551% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyne Rainero
101W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Margo Coble
79W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kathryn Hommel
112W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Nicole Burgess
26W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Kathryn Biggs
76W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Miran Robarts
80W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Elaine Chang
82W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Michele McInerney
24W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jessica Pearson
93W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Jill Isenbarger
77W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Joan Hiam
39W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Laura Powers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paisley Kelling
59W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paola Michel
91W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.