Teams

Down the Lines

2025 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-16vs PTSA 4.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Merritt / Gage Young vs Sandra Cashen / Beth Calvo5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Ware / Michelle Phillips vs Suzanna Murali / Anya Sandusky6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Jane Doe vs Terry Hardy / Kayce McEwan6-4, 6-3
2025-05-14vs Porritt OnLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Merritt / Hanna Bigelow vs Bobette Wood / Jody Mallane1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Phillips vs Jennifer Swing1-6, 2-6
2025-04-23vs Porritt OnLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarmen Little / Hanna Bigelow vs Bobette Wood / Rachel Kincheloe4-6, 2-6
2025-04-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Merritt / Michelle Phillips vs Robyn Roby / Anya Sandusky7-5, 7-6
2025-04-14vs Porritt OnLost 02
L#1 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Carmen Little vs Rachel Kincheloe / Lauren Drew2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Merritt / Michelle Phillips vs Mila Wood / Lori Griffel3-6, 2-6
2025-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Carmen Little vs Nicole Hancock / Robyn Roby6-2, 6-3
2025-04-02vs Porritt OnLost 12
W#1 SinglesGage Young vs Suzie Sabala2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Vicki McBride vs Rachel Kincheloe / Jody Mallane6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Shelley Ware vs Jami Garver / Debbie Wachtell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Porritt On1003828210
2Down the Lines46142657382
3PTSA 4.51983268439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.12
Joelle Staley
published 4.5
4.01
Dana Gross
published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.95
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.95
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
3.80
Jayme Sullivan
published 4
3.66
Suzanne Baran
published 4
Gage Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Hanna Bigelow
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Rosellini + Clarissa Cutler-Evans13460% games+3.7% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Dana Rosellini81246% games−0.3% vs expected
Dana Rosellini + Shelley Ware3745% games−0.8% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Shelley Ware7857% games−1.1% vs expected
Dana Rosellini + Dana Gross282652% games−1.4% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Clarissa Cutler-Evans1544% games−5.3% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Debbie Merritt4543% games−6.0% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Dana Gross5357% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clarissa Cutler-Evans
107W–68L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Joelle Staley
65W–70L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dana Gross
73W–68L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Jayme Sullivan
49W–57L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Gage Young
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hanna Bigelow
7W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
21W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.