Teams

ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AM4.0A-DT

2026 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Men's 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-12vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Cave / Jake Presley vs Josh Sarpotdar / Chris Mathews7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlex Keim vs Vansen Wong4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-10vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Andersen / James Cave vs Rob Lessler / Jesse Pangilinan3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChirdeep Bhutani vs Nate O'Brien6-4, 6-2
2026-03-05vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesJake Presley / James Cave vs Richard Hitchcock / Josh Sarpotdar6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRusty Mendoza vs Jesse Pangilinan6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMark Webster / Dani Weinstein vs Brian Katz / Rick Maher4-6, 2-6
2026-03-04vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex Keim / Rusty Mendoza vs Rob Lessler / Nate O'Brien7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDani Weinstein / Mark Webster vs Richard Hitchcock / Brian Katz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-27vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatt Hillman / Alex Keim vs Ryan Renteria / Richard Hitchcock5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSohail Desai / Matt Goodman vs Rick Maher / Rob Lessler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-12vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesJake Presley / Scott Andersen vs Chris Mathews / Richard Hitchcock5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRusty Mendoza vs Vansen Wong6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Webster / Matt Hillman vs Rick Maher / Rick Ray6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-05vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesSohail Desai / Matt Hillman vs Josh Sarpotdar / Richard Hitchcock4-6, 6-7
2026-01-29vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlex Keim / Matt Hillman vs Ryan Renteria / Rob Lessler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRusty Mendoza vs Josh Sarpotdar4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJake Presley / Sohail Desai vs Rick Maher / Brian Katz6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-13vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Keim / Chirdeep Bhutani vs Brian Katz / Richard Hitchcock6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRusty Mendoza vs David Self1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMatt Hillman / Jake Presley vs Josh Sarpotdar / Rob Lessler6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-01-06vs RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Keim / Sohail Desai vs Ryan Renteria / Jesse Pangilinan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRubin Sandhu vs Nate O'Brien0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlec Stanculescu / Mark Webster vs Rob Lessler / Chris Mathews0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men's 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RIO DEL ORO 40AM4.0A-DT73181231252
2ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 40AM4.0A-DT37121843294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Alex Keim
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.85
Chirdeep Bhutani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.85
Jake Presley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Rusty Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.77
James Cave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Matt Hillman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.55
Sohail Desai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Alec Stanculescu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Dani Weinstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Rubin Sandhu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Mark Webster
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Keim + Chirdeep Bhutani6167% games+14.9% vs expected
Chirdeep Bhutani + Matt Hillman2347% games+3.3% vs expected
Jake Presley + James Cave4162% gamesnot enough data
Alex Keim + Rusty Mendoza134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Keim
23W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Chirdeep Bhutani
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jake Presley
20W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Rusty Mendoza
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
James Cave
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Matt Hillman
9W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Sohail Desai
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Alec Stanculescu
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dani Weinstein
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Rubin Sandhu
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Mark Webster
15W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.