Teams

Western: Watertree Point Control

2026 18&Over Men · 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-13vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Sullivan vs Matthew Funiciello2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-31vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Lewczuk / Michael Starke vs Eriksen Stropp / George Cosentino6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohns Hsieh vs Matthew Funiciello6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatrick O'Toole / Robert Dotterer vs Michael Chang / Shay Smyth6-1, 6-0
2026-05-30vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Starke / Adam Lewczuk vs William Osborne / Michael Chang6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohns Hsieh / Kurran Singh vs Ben Bradley / Jackson Bradley6-0, 6-3
2026-05-10vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJohns Hsieh / Jake Sandler vs Ben Bradley / Jackson Bradley6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlexander McCarthy / Benjamin Klempka vs William Osborne / Shay Smyth6-2, 6-2
2026-05-07vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohns Hsieh / Joon Young Kim vs Shay Smyth / David Fernando6-2, 6-3
2026-04-26vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesPatrick O'Toole vs Brett Sullivan6-3, 6-2
2026-04-12vs Bradley 18+ 4.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesJohns Hsieh vs Brett Sullivan6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Colin Nardella
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.49
Michael Starke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Joe Caiello
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.46
Jeffrey Lonczak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.43
Adam Lewczuk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Pawel Grzegrzolka
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.42
Robert Dotterer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
JASON BARTON
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.41
Patrick O'Toole
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Hang Yuan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.39
Shane Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Jake Sandler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.26
Johns Hsieh
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.26
Frank Donaldson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Benjamin Klempka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Daniel Sullivan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Joon Young Kim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Matthew Mannara
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
4.12
Alexander McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.07
Kurran Singh
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.94
Matthew Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hang Yuan + Michael Starke7181% games+24.5% vs expected
Frank Donaldson + Alexander McCarthy8176% games+10.6% vs expected
Shane Evans + Alexander McCarthy8657% games+6.6% vs expected
JASON BARTON + Alexander McCarthy7257% games+3.0% vs expected
JASON BARTON + Patrick O'Toole10066% games+0.1% vs expected
Joe Caiello + Pawel Grzegrzolka10271% games−1.1% vs expected
Frank Donaldson + Shane Evans6453% games−11.5% vs expected
Jeffrey Lonczak + Patrick O'Toole044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colin Nardella
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
4.78
Michael Starke
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
Joe Caiello
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
4.47
Jeffrey Lonczak
25W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Adam Lewczuk
7W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
4.43
Pawel Grzegrzolka
36W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
Robert Dotterer
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
JASON BARTON
45W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
Patrick O'Toole
32W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
Hang Yuan
52W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
4.39
Shane Evans
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
Jake Sandler
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Johns Hsieh
15W–0L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
4.26
4.5
Frank Donaldson
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Benjamin Klempka
13W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Daniel Sullivan
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joon Young Kim
111W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
Matthew Mannara
16W–9L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.19
4.5
Alexander McCarthy
52W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Kurran Singh
47W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
4.07
Matthew Jackson
112W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.