← Teams

THPRD-Rankin/Wu

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Sue Gregoire
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Timora Konigwilcox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Xia Wu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Michael Sather
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Rebecca Redding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Tiare Farris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Coral Nash
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Jill Sather
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Results7 ties
2020-03-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Suzanne DeLea vs John Robb / Michelle Donato6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs Deanna Lautenbach / Nathan Austin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiare Farris / Jim Rankin vs Keisuke Komine / Yuko Hopman6-3, 7-5
2020-02-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Suzanne DeLea vs Bonnie Sidoff / Matthew Trank6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs Donna Feuerherdt / Ronald Jackson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSue Gregoire / Jim Rankin vs Allison Schenk / Patrick Trank6-2, 6-4
2020-02-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJim Rankin / Rebecca Redding - * vs Gale Volk / Matthew Condit2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs Susan Ford / Quang Pham6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Coral Nash vs Michi VanGrunsven / Thomas McGirk3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-02-01Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRenato Bernasconi Zuccari / Sue Gregoire vs Catherine Go / Christopher Haddon6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEsteban Hidalgo / Coral Nash vs Frank Lippy / Mariniah Prendergast6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGreg Ponitz / Xia Wu vs Damon Ogden / Maureen Harwood7-5, 7-5
2020-01-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesEsteban Hidalgo / Timora Konigwilcox vs Doug Freeman / Lynn McKelvey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Gregoire / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari vs Jack Schunk / Mary Anderson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiare Farris / Tim Campbell vs Karen McNairy / Mike McNairy7-5, 6-1
2020-01-18Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesXia Wu / Greg Ponitz vs Colin Arnold / Sydney Taggart4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Timora Konigwilcox vs Deepak Selvanathan / Juan Li6-3, 6-3
2020-01-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTim Campbell / Tiare Farris vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Jack Hughes7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJim Rankin / Coral Nash vs Minou Chau / James Feeney7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Sather / Jill Sather vs Jeff Berman / Rebecca Jacobs3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
3%97%0%
4.11
4.5
Timora Konigwilcox
35W–68L career
19%81%0%
3.99
4.5
Xia Wu
54W–79L career · type A
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Renato Bernasconi Zuccari
62W–56L career
33%67%0%
3.92
4.5
Michael Sather
43W–69L career
48%52%0%
3.87
4.5
Rebecca Redding
97W–95L career
54%46%0%
3.85
4.5
Tiare Farris
43W–54L career
65%35%0%
3.80
4.5
Coral Nash
39W–69L career
67%33%0%
3.80
4
Jill Sather
45W–75L career
1%99%0%
3.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.