Teams

Wynlakes-Watts

2025 Spring USTA 40 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 3.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-19vs MG-SellersLost 12
W#1 DoublesBetsey Johns / Melissa McDaniel vs Regina Dinger / Joan Ensley6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShay Rogers / Daisy Zaner vs Deborah Langham / Mary Weidler3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatharine Buelow / Linda Pugh vs Sharon Woernle / Diane Johnson3-6, 2-6
2025-03-05vs Lagoon - BennettWon 40
W#1 SinglesShay Rogers vs Betsy Cannon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Pugh / Patricia Watts vs Valerie Smedley / Supin Scott6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDaisy Zaner / Leah Jones vs Stephanie Hust / Heather Russell6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesHelen Gary / Catherine Ray vs Judith Heinzman / Giulliana Porter6-2, 6-4
2025-02-26vs MG-SellersLost 23
W#1 DoublesBetsey Johns / Melissa McDaniel vs Mary Weidler / Deborah Langham7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesShay Rogers vs Regina Dinger4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Steineker / Linda Pugh vs Mary Loy / Joan Ensley6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDaisy Zaner / Catherine Ray vs Sharon Woernle / Diane Johnson6-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesDawn Patterson / Katharine Buelow vs Karen Agnello / Gina Sellers7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-14vs Lagoon - BennettWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Watts / Karen Steineker vs Jennifer Bennett / Jewell Pitts3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Patterson / Catherine Ray vs Giulliana Porter / Betsy Cannon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Pugh / Katharine Buelow vs Stephanie Hust / Heather Russell6-2, 6-3
2025-02-05vs MG-SellersWon 32
W#1 DoublesPatricia Watts / Melissa McDaniel vs Deborah Langham / Mary Weidler6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKaren Steineker vs Brannon Barragan7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBetsey Johns / Julie Knight vs Mary Loy / Joan Ensley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaisy Zaner / Catherine Ray vs Sharon Woernle / Diane Johnson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesKatharine Buelow / Helen Gary vs Felicia Brooks / Karen Agnello6-7, 1-6
2025-01-25vs Lagoon - BennettWon 32
L#1 DoublesKaren Steineker / Melissa McDaniel vs Jewell Pitts / DEBRA SLEDGE6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBetsey Johns vs Betsy Cannon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Watts / Linda Pugh vs Jennifer Bennett / Renea Lee6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDaisy Zaner / Julie Knight vs Lori Milner / Giulliana Porter6-2, 6-1
W#4 DoublesHelen Gary / Katharine Buelow vs Kay Cannady / Stephanie Hust6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Daisy Zaner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.09
Patricia Watts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Karen Steineker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Dawn Patterson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Betsey Johns
usually #1 Doubles 22%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.68
Shay Rogers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Katharine Buelow
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Linda Pugh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.66
Helen Gary
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Julie Knight
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Catherine Ray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Melissa McDaniel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsey Johns + Patricia Watts2444% games−2.8% vs expected
Linda Pugh + Helen Gary134 matchesnot enough data
Katharine Buelow + Helen Gary314 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Watts + Shay Rogers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daisy Zaner
43W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Patricia Watts
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Karen Steineker
28W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Dawn Patterson
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Betsey Johns
15W–37L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Shay Rogers
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Katharine Buelow
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Linda Pugh
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Helen Gary
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Julie Knight
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
2.5
Catherine Ray
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Melissa McDaniel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.