Teams

APEX:SlamAway:Deeley

2024 ME Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 1

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MAINE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2023-12-09vs APEX:DifferentStrokes:CrosbyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Sisk / Sarah Parisien vs Elizabeth Langham / Andrew Shur0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Gilfoil / Mark Algara vs Lori Nadeau / John Higgins3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Myers / Eileen Spencer vs Lori Pelletier / Matthew Holland2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-12-09vs MP:MixedResults:BoyleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Rieff / Mark Algara vs Matthew Boyle / Keri Seitz3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Phillips / Nat May vs Kate Willeford / Drew Tieman6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Christopher Myers vs Tony DiMarco / Deirdre Bannon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-11-19vs WOOD:BryantLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Gilfoil / Mark Algara vs Carmensol Kesselhaut / Robert Epstein6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGary McEvoy / Tana Leonhart vs Brett Stillman / Penny Guyton2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Lukas / Kristin Rieff vs Whitney Wignall / Simon Wignall5-7, 0-6
2023-11-19vs APEX:DifferentStrokes:CrosbyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Sisk / Sarah Parisien vs Ruth Crosby / Subrata Das3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Algara / Elizabeth Deeley vs Elizabeth Langham / John Higgins4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGary McEvoy / Eileen Spencer vs Regina Morton / David Bailey3-6, 3-6
2023-11-04vs MP:MixedResults:BoyleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Algara / Sarah Parisien vs Matthew Boyle / Jane Jukes2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Christopher Myers vs Kate Willeford / Drew Tieman7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Phillips / Gary McEvoy vs Janice Robinson / Peter Allen0-6, 6-7
2023-11-04vs MRC:Mid-CourtCrises:GrantLost 03
L#1 DoublesCHUCK SPENCER / Eileen Spencer vs Jack Nicolet / Kimberly Nicolet1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Howe / Christopher Myers vs Scott Barnes / Lisa Barnes2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Lukas / Kristin Rieff vs Gerald Quirk / Debbie Stevenson2-6, 1-6
2023-10-22vs MRC:SomeStringsAttached:NickelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Parisien / Nat May vs Jim Nickelson / Wendy Jackson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Rieff / Christopher Myers vs Tim Trumbauer / Elizabeth O'Connor4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTana Leonhart / Alan Lukas vs Kipp Wright / Linda Fu1-6, 3-6
2023-10-22vs ETC/ATC:DoubleTrouble:JacksonWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele Gilfoil / Mark Algara vs Daniel Johnston / Amy Jackson7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCHUCK SPENCER / Eileen Spencer vs Timothy Lewis / Rose Chong-Toothaker5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChloe Howe / Christopher Myers vs Jeffrey Dalrymple / Kathleen Kurjanowicz6-2, 6-4
2023-10-07vs ETC/ATC:DoubleTrouble:JacksonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Gilfoil / Jonathan Sisk vs Amy Jackson / Richard Hsu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristin Rieff / Alan Lukas vs Susan Keene / Daniel Johnston0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCHUCK SPENCER / Eileen Spencer vs Rose Chong-Toothaker / Ruky Somasundera2-6, 5-7
2023-10-07vs MRC:SomeStringsAttached:NickelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Phillips / Jonathan Sisk vs Jim Nickelson / Julie Faure3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCHUCK SPENCER / Eileen Spencer vs Jennifer Roper / Timothy Fong3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Deeley / Alan Lukas vs Parker Chamberlin / Wendy Jackson0-6, 2-6
2023-09-24vs MRC:Mid-CourtCrises:GrantLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Phillips / Nat May vs Gerald Quirk / Virginia Fanelli4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Rieff / Mark Algara vs Scott Barnes / Lisa Barnes3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Ledoux / Elizabeth Deeley vs Robert GRANT / Marcia Robbins1-6, 5-7
2023-09-24vs WOOD:BryantLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Gilfoil / Mark Algara vs Brett Stillman / Penny Guyton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChloe Howe / Nat May vs Whitney Wignall / Simon Wignall4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoger Ledoux / Tana Leonhart vs Virgilia Bryant / Gordon Haldeman1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 6.0 Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:SomeStringsAttached:Nickelson93261022246
2APEX:DifferentStrokes:Crosby9327922293
3MP:MixedResults:Boyle93231332302
4MRC:Mid-CourtCrises:Grant66181839320
5WOOD:Bryant57152143338
6ETC/ATC:DoubleTrouble:Jackson39142249366
7APEX:SlamAway:Deeley11133368428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Michele Gilfoil
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.83
Christopher Myers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.82
Jonathan Sisk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Sarah Parisien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Tana Leonhart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
MERYL E Nierman
published
2.53
Kristin Rieff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Elizabeth Deeley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Chloe Howe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Alan Lukas
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
CHUCK SPENCER
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Eileen Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gary McEvoy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Algara
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Nat May
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roger Ledoux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Myers + Elizabeth Deeley3348% games−1.1% vs expected
Mark Algara + Michele Gilfoil2538% gamesnot enough data
Eileen Spencer + CHUCK SPENCER044 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Myers + Chloe Howe123 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Rieff + Alan Lukas033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Gilfoil
12W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Christopher Myers
29W–68L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Jonathan Sisk
26W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Sarah Parisien
37W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Tana Leonhart
26W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
MERYL E Nierman
28W–35L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Kristin Rieff
13W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Elizabeth Deeley
16W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Chloe Howe
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Alan Lukas
0W–6L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
CHUCK SPENCER
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eileen Spencer
3W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gary McEvoy
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Algara
5W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nat May
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Ledoux
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.