Teams

SBowers

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-05vs KTownsend/LRoss (40+ 6.5)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCandice Kish / Laura Bell vs Julie Brigham / Dianna Erwin2-6, 4-6
2022-09-28vs ICShaw/LyleWon 10
W#2 DoublesCandice Kish / Sarah Glover vs Cornelia Shaw / Karen Burke6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-21vs IKJohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesErica Rankin / Joy Cooper vs Diane Sauer / Tobi Buckley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-14vs YBarrow40+ 6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesErica Rankin / Joy Cooper vs Parker Wright / Caroline Wall6-3, 6-0
2022-08-31vs IPCochranLost 01
L#1 DoublesCandice Kish / Wendie Hill vs Lisa Lathram / Mary Ann Enzweiler5-7, 3-6
2022-08-24vs KHuffstetler 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Mailly / Erica Rankin vs Molly Clark / Mary Jo Nugent4-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs EMerrittLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Bell / Erica Rankin vs Heather Brewer / Ramsay Younger4-6, 2-6
2022-08-10vs Kopp/SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesCandice Kish / Wendie Hill vs Ilsy Chappell / Meghan Yancey4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Holly Lotterhos
published 3.5
3.21
Barbara Mccartney
published 3.5
3.21
Erica Rankin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
2.92
Candice Kish
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Christine Panzl
published 3
2.71
Susan Bowers
published
2.63
Ann Mailly
published 3
2.60
Wendie Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bowers + Annette Tavernaro213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Lotterhos
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Mccartney
5W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Erica Rankin
61W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Annette Tavernaro
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Candice Kish
89W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Christine Panzl
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Bowers
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Ann Mailly
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Wendie Hill
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.