← Teams

PTC-Lee

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Christina Melander
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Chelsea Place
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Shannon Davis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Michelle Cortez
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesChristina Melander / Valerie Neill vs Karin Owens / KC Bildner6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Nicola Ash / Amelia Hooker2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Julia Henry6-1, 6-3
2022-03-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Chelsea Place vs Jing Li / Lupine Swanson6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShannon Davis vs Rachel Connell0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Lolich / Michelle Cortez vs Jean Schnadig / Qin Lian6-3, 6-4
2022-02-27Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesChristina Melander / Valerie Neill vs Heidi Kjos / Heidi Palena6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Mera Cosgrove7-5, 6-4
2022-02-12Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Arwood / Valerie Neill vs Deana Julka / Sara Crate6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Sara Vanderhoff6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Rose Lee vs Kayla Casebeer / Rachel Young6-1, 6-0
2022-02-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesChelsea Place / Valerie Neill vs Miriam Habafy / Katja Daoud6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Penny Langhammer6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Tracy Moffett / Luz Zanavich4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-23Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesShannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Jinmi Kemple / Wanda Ng6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Melander vs Emily Vander Ploeg6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRose Lee / Chelsea Place vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Janice Kuo3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Jessica Hutchins vs Mihee Park / Rosalie Trevejo7-6, 6-2
2022-01-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Elizabeth Arwood vs Dorothy Cofield / Sally Papadimas6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTiffany Bowie vs Kourtnie Katayama6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Davis / Jessica Hutchins vs Samanta Rodriguez Silva / Nadine Hazard6-2, 6-0
2022-01-09Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Chelsea Place vs Allison Bader / Teresa Metke6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Karen Simon / Melanie DeSilva6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChristina Melander vs Katie Simpson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Jessica Hutchins vs Theresa Gonzales / Jenell Henson6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Christina Melander
111W–81L career
4%96%0%
3.66
3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Chelsea Place
32W–27L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3
Shannon Davis
44W–40L career
0%94%6%
2.88
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Michelle Cortez
20W–25L career
11%88%0%
2.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.