Teams

Chandlers Landing/Johnson W7.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT W Monday · W7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-31vs High Point/Cavey W7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Dufrene / SUSAN DEERE vs Kelly Britson / Cissy Boyle2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaula Gloviak / Julie Asbill vs Sandy Debusk / Anne Savino3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Johnson / Elaine Ayres vs Carolyn Vail / Leslie Vogeli2-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs McKinney/Mutter W7.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Tammy Pinder vs Molly McKenzie / Francoise Moyes Carnal6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Dufrene / SUSAN DEERE vs Anita Whitney / Estela Zodrow6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaula Gloviak / Julie Asbill vs Doreen McDonnell / Julie Menhart6-0, 6-2
2025-03-17vs High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDana Johnson / SUSAN DEERE vs Renee Simpson / Jeanne Trischett6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHolly Ford / Julie Asbill vs Mary Dwiggins / Dina Patel6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-10vs Canyon Creek/Dawson W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Pinder / SUSAN DEERE vs Tami Jost / Laurin Shambora6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Dufrene / Holly Ford vs Allison Carlson / Sue Hart4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesElaine Ayres / Paula Gloviak vs Dede Vehslage / Heidi Young6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-03vs McKinney/Steglich-Legault W7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Dufrene / SUSAN DEERE vs Danette Goodyear / Tamela Gough6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Gloviak / Sarah Johnson vs Donna Legault / Deborah Schlang2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Ayres / Julie Asbill vs Tammi Cole / Arlene Wiese6-2, 6-2
2025-02-24vs Kiest/Altenau-Conner W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Tammy Pinder vs Julie Altenau / Christie McFarland4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSUSAN DEERE / Laura Dufrene vs Lori Ruehle / Lesia Allen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Asbill / Sarah Johnson vs Sheila Conner / Kandis Thompson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-17vs High Point/Buchanan W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesSUSAN DEERE / Laura Dufrene vs Laura Schussler / Jenny Burnett7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Tammy Pinder vs Angela Dekinder / Debbie Buchanan5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Gloviak / Elaine Ayres vs Stephanie Bice / Trase Werner6-4, 6-4
2025-02-03vs High Point/Collins-Walters W7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSUSAN DEERE / Julie Asbill vs Jackie Coburn / Jannese Knaus1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Gloviak / Tammy Pinder vs Annette Quadling / Beverly Vucekovich1-6, 4-6
2025-01-27vs Stonebridge/Wierwille W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Tammy Pinder vs Lisa Wierwille / Robin Bates5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Paula Gloviak vs Kelly Ann Tallo / Margie Schraer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Asbill / Elaine Ayres vs Lisa Herman / Lori Roberts4-6, 0-6
2025-01-23vs SpringPark/Martinez-Lindsey W7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesDana Johnson / Tammy Pinder vs Nancy Lacey / Lori Lindsey6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Dufrene / Holly Ford vs Darby Jolly / Teri Wilson4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Asbill / Paula Gloviak vs Leanne Freiberg / Fran Zartler6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · W7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SpringPark/Martinez-Lindsey W7.08223716208
2Canyon Creek/Dawson W7.07322820194
3High Point/Collins-Walters W7.073181230251
4Stonebridge/Wierwille W7.064191128262
5High Point/Cavey W7.055161433262
6Chandlers Landing/Johnson W7.055131737272
7High Point/Master-Simpson W7.055131739291
8Kiest/Altenau-Conner W7.055141640311
9McKinney/Steglich-Legault W7.046111939300
10High Point/Buchanan W7.037111942295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Laura Dufrene
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.08
Julie Asbill
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Elaine Ayres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paula Gloviak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
SUSAN DEERE
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tammy Pinder
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Dufrene + SUSAN DEERE7257% gamesnot enough data
Julie Asbill + Paula Gloviak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Dufrene
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
Julie Asbill
11W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Elaine Ayres
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Paula Gloviak
9W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
SUSAN DEERE
8W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Pinder
9W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.