Teams

Brevard/Tichacek/55&Over6.0MXD

2024 Brevard Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-27vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Virgil Watson vs Mark Redmon / Patricia de Simone4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-20vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 10
W#2 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Taysir Abdalla vs Christina M Tuccio / Anthony Michaels6-1, 6-1
2024-09-06vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Jiannine / Taysir Abdalla vs Christina M Tuccio / Mark Redmon6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdela Tichacek / Mike Tichacek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-23vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 10
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Virgil Watson vs Patricia de Simone / Mark Redmon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-16vs Kiwi - HargroveLost 01
L#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Jay Riffe vs Patricia de Simone / Noel Donaghey1-6, 0-6
2024-08-09vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdela Tichacek / Mike Tichacek vs Patricia de Simone / Mark Redmon6-0, 6-2
2024-08-02vs Kiwi - HargroveWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdela Tichacek / Mike Tichacek vs Mary Stoops / Thomas Hargrove6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTrisha Watson / Virgil Watson vs Christina M Tuccio / Paul Newman7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Bruce Brothers
published 3
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Trisha Watson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.90
Adela Tichacek
published 3
2.57
Mike Tichacek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Jay Riffe
published
Mary Stallard
published
Taysir Abdalla
published
Thomas Stallard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Tichacek + Adela Tichacek15266% games+23.7% vs expected
Thomas Stallard + Mary Stallard4943% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bruce Brothers
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Trisha Watson
130W–177L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Adela Tichacek
21W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Mike Tichacek
298W–203L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
Jay Riffe
6W–19L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Mary Stallard
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taysir Abdalla
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Stallard
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.