Teams

BC-WestEnd/DianeKaiser

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-13vs BC-MCC/JulieWattsLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristeen Field / Kathy di Angelo vs Kris Rone / Drisa Carrizo1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Kaiser / Sayaka Amano vs Jhoanna Torres / Denise Towsley2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDenise Vega vs Lauren Bruksch4-6, 2-6
2021-06-12vs BC-WestEnd/CherylUnreinWon 21
W#1 DoublesJULIE MOORE / Jennie Speciale vs Lisa Avila / Pamela Milroy7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Kaiser / Janice Bittker vs Pam Quinn / Kelly Evans6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesForrest Bleakley / Rebecca Chavira vs Aileen Kizlinski / Jennifer Siegal1-6, 1-6
2021-05-30vs BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-HoriiWon 10
W#1 DoublesSayaka Amano / Diane Kaiser vs Judy Purne / Sophie Sokolow6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-23vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemLost 04
L#1 DoublesChristeen Field / Gale Dunleavy vs Amy Thompson / MINA RICABAR7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy di Angelo / Tess Pugliese vs Mika Kaiser / Reiko Sasagawa6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJULIE MOORE vs Karen Bronson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Kaiser / Denise Vega vs JANE CHUN / Tami Reyes1-6, 1-6
2021-05-16vs BC-MCC/DianeWellbaumSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDenise Vega vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesForrest Bleakley / Rebecca Chavira vs Rona Martins / Marci Beech3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-02vs BC-MCC/JulieWattsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristeen Field / Denise Vega vs Jhoanna Torres / Denise Towsley3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Kaiser / Tess Pugliese vs Lindsay Ashcraft / Lauren Bruksch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-25vs BC-WestEnd/CherylUnreinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDenise Vega / Sungsoon Han vs Suzanne Dunn / Lisa Avila6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSayaka Amano vs Kimberly Daffner4-6, 3-6
2021-04-18vs BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-HoriiLost 03
L#1 SinglesSayaka Amano vs Virginia Knebel3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJULIE MOORE vs Galena Miller-Horii0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Chavira / Kay C Johnson vs Concetta Brown / Lisa Hawk6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-11vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Vega / Christeen Field vs Tami Reyes / Elaine Sabosky3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTess Pugliese vs Erin Fiorito6-0, 6-1
2021-04-03vs BC-MCC/DianeWellbaumWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristeen Field / Kari Bao vs Kari Carpino / Stephanie Twombley6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJULIE MOORE / Jennie Speciale vs Dianne Wellbaum / Mimi Fischer6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTess Pugliese vs Amy Karr6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDenise Vega / Charmaine Nielsen vs Melinda Arentsen / Denise Wolf6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Anna Gorzkowski
published 4.5
4.05
Jennie Speciale
published
3.98
Gale Dunleavy
published 4
3.83
Eileen Kaiser
published 4
3.82
JULIE MOORE
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Denise Vega
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Diane Kaiser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Christeen Field
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Sungsoon Han
published
3.62
Sayaka Amano
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.60
3.51
Kathy Valdesuso
published
3.46
Rebecca Chavira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Kay C Johnson
published
Tess Pugliese
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Vega + Christeen Field71052% gamesnot enough data
JULIE MOORE + Christeen Field4163% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Chavira + Denise Vega134 matchesnot enough data
Diane Kaiser + Kathy Valdesuso224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Kaiser + Denise Vega134 matchesnot enough data
Charmaine Nielsen + Christeen Field303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Gorzkowski
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Gale Dunleavy
16W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Eileen Kaiser
19W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
JULIE MOORE
97W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Denise Vega
52W–52L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Diane Kaiser
15W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Christeen Field
95W–83L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Sungsoon Han
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Sayaka Amano
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Charmaine Nielsen
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kathy Valdesuso
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Rebecca Chavira
99W–92L career · 3 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kay C Johnson
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Tess Pugliese
46W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.