Teams

EW-PEAK-Unruh

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 4.0 WOMEN Spokane

15 players · average NTRP 3.89 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-25vs WCCP-McGregorSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCinthia Campos vs Valerie Rubright6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAshlie Unruh / Lea Williams vs Lisa Hagen / Andi Hart6-3, 6-3
2023-03-11vs WCCP-McGregorLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnsley Bolme / Paula Kamp vs Valerie Rubright / Kiersten Shelby3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Carlsen / Collette Jarvelin vs Caitlin Hicks / Alyssa Fitzgerald3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLindsey Widmyer vs Miki Peck6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Burgeson / Cyndie Lempesis vs Tamara McGregor / Tiffany Sauer3-6, 5-7
2023-02-25vs WCCP-McGregorLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Burgeson / Denise Mai vs Kiersten Shelby / Andi Hart5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesCinthia Campos vs Rene Reighard6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Carlsen / Janet Owen vs Samantha Mathews / Karen Mathews5-7, 1-6
2023-01-21vs WCCP-McGregorSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLaura Burgeson vs Kiersten Shelby6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnsley Bolme / Paula Kamp vs Laura Cremers / Lisa Hagen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 WOMEN Spokane
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PEAK-Unruh22101022170
2WCCP-McGregor22101022185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Angela Gibbar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Wendy Teets
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Denise Mai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ansley Bolme
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Cinthia Campos
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ashlie Unruh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Valerie Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Laura Burgeson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.47
Lea Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Cyndie Lempesis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Collette Jarvelin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Janet Owen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lindsey Widmyer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Paula Kamp
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Tracy Carlsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Teets + Denise Mai13363% games+9.2% vs expected
Ashlie Unruh + Valerie Garcia5161% games+6.8% vs expected
Wendy Teets + Ashlie Unruh4257% games+2.7% vs expected
Denise Mai + Paula Kamp4549% games−0.4% vs expected
Ansley Bolme + Valerie Garcia0638% games−2.4% vs expected
Denise Mai + Valerie Garcia192048% games−4.2% vs expected
Janet Owen + Valerie Garcia2643% games−5.5% vs expected
Janet Owen + Paula Kamp1531% games−11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Gibbar
46W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
4.13
Wendy Teets
36W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Denise Mai
42W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ansley Bolme
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cinthia Campos
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ashlie Unruh
41W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Valerie Garcia
44W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.62
Laura Burgeson
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Lea Williams
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cyndie Lempesis
101W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Collette Jarvelin
17W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Janet Owen
27W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.19
Lindsey Widmyer
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
0
Paula Kamp
28W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Carlsen
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.