Teams

CC LLW Sczbecki 55 8.0

2023 CC 55 & OVER · CC 55 & Over M 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-24vs CC-SLOverheads/Cleere 8.0 M 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Andrew Weber vs Bryan Crawford / Robert Simons3-6, 3-6
2023-06-10vs CC-Avila/Markoff 55 8.0 MWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lambert / Mark Sczbecki vs John Lyle / Bill Wesnousky6-0, 6-0
2023-05-21vs CC-SLOverheads/Cleere 8.0 M 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Daniel Lambert vs Robert Simons / Bryan Crawford7-6, 6-1
2023-05-13vs CC-Avila/Markoff 55 8.0 MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Andrew Weber vs John Lyle / Bruce Freeberg6-2, 6-2
2023-04-29vs CC-SLOverheads/Cleere 8.0 M 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesFred Mina / Mark Sczbecki vs Mark Minnoch / William Good6-2, 6-1
2023-04-22vs CC-Avila/Markoff 55 8.0 MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Tai Martin vs John Lyle / Ken Johnston6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC 55 & Over M 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mark Sczbecki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Daniel Lambert
published 4
3.77
Dana Evangelista
published 4
3.76
Stephen Lakowske
published
3.51
Andrew Weber
published 3.5
3.20
David Silberberger
published 3.5
Donald Blessen
published
Fred Mina
published
Hal Sweasey
published
Howard Nicholson
published
Mark Boone
published
Tai Martin
published
Tyler Corse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Boone + Dana Evangelista123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sczbecki
82W–17L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Daniel Lambert
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Dana Evangelista
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Stephen Lakowske
30W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Andrew Weber
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
David Silberberger
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Donald Blessen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Fred Mina
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hal Sweasey
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Howard Nicholson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Boone
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tai Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tyler Corse
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.