VTC-Cavallucci/Lang

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74

Rachel Novak

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.68

Jordan Busch

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.57

Cathleen Lang

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5

3.54

Evan Cohn

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.30

Brett Israel

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.28

Stefano Cavallucci

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.27

Gretchen Newcomb

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

—

Lia Irvin

published 3.5

—

Lyudmila Leissler

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.24

Adam Rainey

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.21

Sebastian Llados Vila

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.15

Rajesh Rengarajan

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Rachel Novak

71W–39L career

1%99%0%

3.74

Jordan Busch

0W–4L career · type S

12%87%2%

3.68

3.5

Cathleen Lang

67W–68L career

0%63%37%

3.57

3.5

Evan Cohn

144W–73L career

0%73%27%

3.54

3.5

Brett Israel

8W–19L career

2%94%4%

3.30

3.5

Stefano Cavallucci

91W–58L career

1%98%1%

3.28

3.5

Gretchen Newcomb

49W–70L career

1%99%0%

3.27

3.5

Lia Irvin

63W–43L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Lyudmila Leissler

69W–45L career

not enough data

—

3.5

Adam Rainey

43W–45L career

1%98%0%

3.24

3.5

Sebastian Llados Vila

74W–60L career

2%97%0%

3.21

3.5

Rajesh Rengarajan

4W–17L career

8%92%0%

3.15

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.