Teams

WC GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs PCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBill Bailey / Chuck Bull vs David Milhan / Marc Hossack3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBlair Gifford / Todd Maas vs Cliff Haw / Per Burchardt6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerry Kret / Jack Lufkin vs Richard Wallner / Ben Blanchard2-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs CPV REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / Chuck Bull vs Alexis Tibar / Michael Vernon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBill Bailey / John Hathorn vs Lon Stuebinger / James Shalvoy6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHal Wright / Terrence Davis vs Bryan Badger / William Smart7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-28vs SS-LT GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesRussell Powell / Bill Bailey vs Mike Jaltuch / Erik Egtvedt0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerrence Davis / Chuck Bull vs John Dungey / James Niziol2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Kret / Todd Maas vs Bob Louden / Mark Thompson2-6, 1-6
2026-05-21vs LTFC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesChuck Bull / Russell Powell vs Brian Fitzgerrell / Jeffrey Shepard2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBlair Gifford / Terrence Davis vs Robert Hall / Scott Ungar1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Donahoe / Jack Lufkin vs Bryan Kortum / John Cranston1-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs GAC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartin Atlas / John Hathorn vs Allan Hoover / Michael Barney3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRussell Powell / Hal Wright vs Matt Briger / Vic Alejandro0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerrence Davis / Stephen Donahoe vs Michael Keirns / Thomas Forti4-6, 4-6
2026-05-13vs SS-H BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesChuck Bull / Russell Powell vs Bill Lacock / Lou Gobis5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJack Lufkin / Todd Maas vs Gerry Cabot / Blake Palmer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHal Wright / Stephen Donahoe vs Norbert Frueh / Marty Bruno4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-04-30vs GAC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesBlair Gifford / Russell Powell vs Brian Mervak / Stephen Gribbon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHal Wright / Martin Atlas vs Jim Lord / Clifford Simms6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJack Lufkin / Terry Kret vs Mike Ward / Jay Sandstrom3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Jack Lufkin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Blair Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Martin Atlas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Bill Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Hal Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Chuck Bull
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
John Hathorn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Russell Powell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stephen Donahoe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terrence Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Kret
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Maas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Gifford + Martin Atlas3251% games−3.5% vs expected
Bill Bailey + Hal Wright4360% gamesnot enough data
Russell Powell + Bill Bailey224 matchesnot enough data
Blair Gifford + Bill Bailey224 matchesnot enough data
John Hathorn + Bill Bailey134 matchesnot enough data
Hal Wright + Martin Atlas404 matchesnot enough data
Russell Powell + Chuck Bull123 matchesnot enough data
Blair Gifford + Chuck Bull123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jack Lufkin
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Blair Gifford
62W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Martin Atlas
35W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bill Bailey
20W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Hal Wright
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Chuck Bull
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
John Hathorn
68W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Russell Powell
10W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Donahoe
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terrence Davis
23W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Kret
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Todd Maas
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.