Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 40AM3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5DLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Ly / Surinder Yadav vs Thangavel Duraisamy / Deepak Rangarao1-6, 3-6
2022-03-13vs CROW CANYON CC 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelvin Chua / David Ly vs William Brown / Steve Carmassi3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-27vs MISSION HILLS 40AM3.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Takishita / David Ly vs Navneet Bhatia / Thomas Pamilla2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Cabral / Surinder Yadav vs Tom Zhang / Mark Cornejo5-7, 4-6
2022-02-20vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesDavid Ly vs Pritesh Dasgupta6-4, 6-0
2022-02-13vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Ly / Surinder Yadav vs Chandra Mundra / Shahram Vahidi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Ly / Erik Singh vs Steve Heninger / William Brown2-6, 4-6
2022-01-30vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5DLost 01
L#1 DoublesSaurabh Shrivastava / Surinder Yadav vs Viswanatha Chittepu / Rohit Chhabra5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.39
Gregory Maroulas
published 3.5
3.32
Scott Takishita
published
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
3.27
David Ly
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Surinder Yadav
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Chua
published
Jingjun JJ Cao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ly + Surinder Yadav5644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Gregory Maroulas
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
David Ly
48W–84L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Surinder Yadav
26W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melvin Chua
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jingjun JJ Cao
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.