Teams

EW-PC-Watson

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 MEN

14 players · average NTRP 4.44 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-23vs WCCP-GrinerWon 32
L#1 DoublesCurtis Darrow / Derek Harmon vs Scott Andersen / David Robin3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSean Singco vs Jeff Judson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSantino Bravo / William Taylor vs Dewey Kim / Eric Donovan7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTan Nguyen vs Harvey Johnson6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Cabasug / Isaac Martinez vs Tom Griner / Henry Preacher2-6, 3-6
2023-04-23vs WCCP-GrinerWon 32
L#1 DoublesEldon Monson / David Haight vs Dewey Kim / Eric Donovan1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesTan Nguyen vs Harvey Johnson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Bake / Mark Watson vs Henry Preacher / Tom Griner3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSean Singco vs Stephen Thatcher6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesIsaac Martinez / Michael Cabasug vs David Robin / Scott Andersen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-22vs WCCP-GrinerWon 41
L#1 DoublesSantino Bravo / William Taylor vs David Robin / Scott Andersen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKenny Saari vs Harvey Johnson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSean Singco / Mark Watson vs Jeff Judson / Henry Preacher6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesTan Nguyen vs Stephen Thatcher6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIsaac Martinez / Matthew Bake vs Tom Griner / Eric Donovan6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-22vs WCCP-GrinerLost 14
L#1 DoublesSean Singco / Isaac Martinez vs Eric Donovan / Dewey Kim4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKenny Saari vs Stephen Thatcher4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEldon Monson / David Haight vs Tom Griner / Henry Preacher5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSantino Bravo vs Jeff Judson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCurtis Darrow / Derek Harmon vs David Robin / Scott Andersen5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Watson3111922177
2WCCP-Griner1391124193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Sean Singco
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
David Haight
published 4.5
Eldon Monson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Isaac Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Matthew Bake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
William Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Kenny Saari
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.95
Derek Harmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Curtis Darrow
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.51
David Jones
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.43
Tan Nguyen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Mark Watson
published
Michael Cabasug
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Santino Bravo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Haight + Eldon Monson4164% games+15.8% vs expected
David Haight + Michael Cabasug3356% games+4.4% vs expected
Curtis Darrow + Derek Harmon71444% games−4.2% vs expected
Curtis Darrow + Michael Cabasug3450% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Singco
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
David Haight
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Eldon Monson
36W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Isaac Martinez
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Matthew Bake
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
William Taylor
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenny Saari
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Derek Harmon
26W–24L career · 6 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
4.5
Curtis Darrow
18W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
David Jones
88W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
4.5
Tan Nguyen
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.43
Mark Watson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Cabasug
37W–16L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Santino Bravo
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.