Teams

NJ RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs LTC-M GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesRenee Richker / Marlene Swartz vs Sara Lewandowski / Emily Rugaber6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHolly Bristol vs Georgia Viado3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDerria Banta vs Michaela Redlingshafer0-6, 6-7
2024-05-23vs MC YELLOWWon 32
L#1 DoublesApril DeLauro / Holly Bristol vs Kylie Sumpter / Kathleen Sumpter1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDerria Banta vs Samantha Baldwin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Kerry Mobley vs Julie Gall / Patricia Shaw7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesKira Moore vs Amy Coddington6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRenee Richker / Jennifer Lyons vs Erika Vincent / Peggy Hofstra6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-16vs RHCC BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesApril DeLauro / Angela Hale vs Kirstin McConnell / Briana Jackson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDerria Banta vs Lia Baros6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKris Hansen / Renee Richker vs Carrie Warren / Rachel Kacmar1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMarlene Swartz vs Katie Wither6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheila O'Neill / Pamela Johnstone vs Jessica Tsuo / Susan Weese7-6, 6-0
2024-05-11vs LTC-M GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarlene Swartz / Lydia Pistol vs Amy Whittier / Emily Rugaber4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesPamela Johnstone vs Georgia Viado1-6, 5-7
2024-05-09vs BP GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Hale / April DeLauro vs Karleigh Kimble / Margarite Parker6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Richker vs Ronda Loredo2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMarlene Swartz / Kris Hansen vs Beth Cendali / Loree Morris6-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesPamela Johnstone vs Katherine Moriarty3-6, 1-6
2024-05-02vs NJ TEALLost 12
W#1 SinglesKira Moore vs Natalie Schaefer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Richker / Marlene Swartz vs Holland Asbach / Adrienne Oliver2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHolly Bristol vs STACEY OELTJENBRUNS4-6, 1-6
2024-04-18vs MC YELLOWLost 23
W#1 DoublesDerria Banta / Lydia Pistol vs Peggy Hofstra / Julie Gall6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKira Moore vs Ellen Sprague1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesApril DeLauro / Jennifer Lyons vs Dana Stehno / Ursula Hamel2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHolly Bristol vs Molly Balmes6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Johnstone / Kerry Mobley vs Erika Vincent / Leslie Hauschildt6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Derria Banta
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Pamela Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Marlene Swartz
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Jennifer Lyons
published
3.37
Kira Moore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Kerry Mobley
published
3.25
April DeLauro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Holly Bristol
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Lydia Pistol
published
3.09
Angela Hale
published 3.5
3.04
Kris Hansen
published
2.96
Renee Richker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Sheila O'Neill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kris Hansen + April DeLauro3354% games+6.4% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Kerry Mobley16460% games+3.8% vs expected
Pamela Johnstone + Marlene Swartz13559% games+2.9% vs expected
Renee Richker + Marlene Swartz2441% games−8.8% vs expected
Jennifer Lyons + Sheila O'Neill6555% games−8.9% vs expected
Renee Richker + Lydia Pistol3737% games−9.6% vs expected
Renee Richker + Holly Bristol41241% gamesnot enough data
Kira Moore + Holly Bristol7751% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Derria Banta
78W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Pamela Johnstone
171W–63L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Marlene Swartz
74W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jennifer Lyons
28W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Kira Moore
98W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kerry Mobley
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
April DeLauro
71W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Holly Bristol
42W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Lydia Pistol
21W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Angela Hale
16W–4L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kris Hansen
21W–24L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Renee Richker
149W–114L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
Sheila O'Neill
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.