Teams

Forest Lakes-Johnston

2024 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-02vs BHSC-FrielLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Bohmke / Mohan Nadkarni vs Jay Bolus / Thomas Weck2-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs BHSC-FrielLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Oliver / Ed Leary vs Reid Phillips / Charles Friel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Baker / Edward Lis vs Thomas Weck / Luke Fairborn3-6, 1-6
2024-10-27vs BHSC-FrielLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Bohmke / Mohan Nadkarni vs Thomas Weck / Mark Raffinan4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEd Leary / Derek Frazier vs Luke Fairborn / Richards Miller4-6, 3-6
2024-10-14vs BHSC-FrielLost 03
L#1 DoublesMohan Nadkarni / Benjamin Baker vs Jimmy Lee / Mark Raffinan0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChris Breeden / Alex Angiolillo vs Luke Fairborn / Lorenzo Davis7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBen Jorgensen / Edward Lis vs Charles Friel / Richards Miller3-6, 3-6
2024-10-10vs BHSC-FrielLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Johnston / Chris Breeden vs Reid Phillips / Richards Miller1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Oliver / Ed Leary vs Mark Raffinan / Charles Friel5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdward Lis / Derek Frazier vs Luke Fairborn / Lorenzo Davis2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Ed Leary
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Chris Breeden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Ben Jorgensen
published 4
3.75
Derek Frazier
published 4
Alex Angiolillo
published 4
3.71
Mohan Nadkarni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
John Oliver
published
3.60
Melvin Herndon
published
3.59
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.50
Edward Lis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Scott Bohmke
published
Wesley Shelley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mohan Nadkarni + Ed Leary8646% gamesnot enough data
Ben Jorgensen + Edward Lis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ed Leary
131W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Chris Breeden
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Ben Jorgensen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Alex Angiolillo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Mohan Nadkarni
60W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
John Oliver
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Melvin Herndon
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Edward Lis
136W–133L career · 3 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Scott Bohmke
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wesley Shelley
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.