Teams

BASALT

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - ASPEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-24vs CROWNLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Richardson / Leslie Riddel vs Crystal McNamee / Karen Kraft3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCorin Brucker / Monica Cohan vs Kelly Capri / Julie Glen5-7, 3-6
2023-07-17vs RVR GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAbigail Lavy / Leslie Riddel vs Jennifer Given / Diane Boat6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Karen Price vs Leslie Keery / Margaret Corcillo1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-10vs GSCC SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Riddel / Ashley Richardson vs Jean Allard / Heidi Paul7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Price / Corin Brucker vs Kate McRaith / Nancy Nordell3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-03vs GSCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Riddel / Ashley Richardson vs Jenell Hilderbrand / Anne Sale3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCorin Brucker / Abigail Lavy vs Mary Boyd / Shannon Francis-Pienaar1-6, 3-6
2023-06-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesCorin Brucker / Karen Price vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Richardson / Laura Guilander vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - ASPEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Denise Taylor
published 3.5
3.30
Karen Price
published
3.18
Adele Melnick
published 3.5
3.00
Ashley Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Leslie Riddel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Corin Brucker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.78
Laura Guilander
published
2.76
Monica Cohan
published
Marilyn Ortmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Riddel + Ashley Richardson222846% games−0.1% vs expected
Corin Brucker + Leslie Riddel134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Taylor
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
Karen Price
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Adele Melnick
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ashley Richardson
41W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Leslie Riddel
34W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Corin Brucker
39W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.92
Laura Guilander
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.78
Monica Cohan
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
2.76
Marilyn Ortmann
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.