Teams

Hampton/40/7.5/Combo/OCC

2025 LAF Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-01vs Hains/40/7.5/Combo/CCRRWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaphne Krampe / Roxanne Breaux vs Donna Comeaux / Nita Harrington6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFran Hampton / Ashley Cooper vs Christine LeMaire / Judy Siefker6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Landry / Cheryl Drozda vs AMY HAINS / Christie Maranto6-1, 6-3
2025-09-10vs Hains/40/7.5/Combo/CCRRWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Landry / Cheryl Drozda vs Christine LeMaire / Leslie Doucet6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren Brown / Laura Wiggins vs Donna Comeaux / Perla Vidos6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jennifer Guilbeaux
published
3.89
Melissa Padgett
published
3.84
Cheryl Drozda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Lee Lanier
published
3.51
Laura Wiggins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Roxanne Breaux
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Daphne Krampe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Lauri Gilder
published
3.08
Mary Schutte
published
3.05
Jacqueline Maggio
published
3.03
Denise Sadler
published 3.5
2.89
Fran Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Landry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Hampton + Jacqueline Maggio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Guilbeaux
26W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Melissa Padgett
24W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Cheryl Drozda
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Lee Lanier
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Laura Wiggins
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Roxanne Breaux
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
3.5
Daphne Krampe
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lauri Gilder
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Mary Schutte
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jacqueline Maggio
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Denise Sadler
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Fran Hampton
3W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Nancy Landry
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.