Teams

SoCal/Cleere/65&Over8.0M

2024 SCTA 65 & OVER · CC SCTA 65+ 8.0 M

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-06vs CC Atascadero HS Sherwin 65+ 8.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Jeff Rowan vs David Rennick / Bill Wesnousky6-2, 6-3
2024-09-21vs CC Atascadero HS Sherwin 65+ 8.0MWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Stephen Lakowske vs David Rennick / William Saiki6-4, 6-2
2024-09-15vs CC Atascadero HS Sherwin 65+ 8.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Daniel Lambert vs Jim Muscarella / Rudy Garcia6-2, 6-3
2024-09-08vs CC Atascadero HS Sherwin 65+ 8.0MWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Sczbecki / Daniel Lambert vs Jim Muscarella / Rudy Garcia6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC SCTA 65+ 8.0 M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Mark Sczbecki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Daniel Lambert
published 4
3.76
Stephen Lakowske
published
Bruce Freeberg
published 4
Donald Blessen
published
Fred Kelley
published
Howard Nicholson
published
Jeff Rowan
published
John Lyle
published
Michael Stanton
published
Scott Cleere
published
Tai Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Stanton + Daniel Lambert4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Sczbecki
82W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Daniel Lambert
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Stephen Lakowske
30W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Bruce Freeberg
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Donald Blessen
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Fred Kelley
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Howard Nicholson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Rowan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Lyle
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Stanton
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Cleere
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tai Martin
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.