Teams

Bitsy Grant (DShawn Murphy)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Low Levels · 4.0 Low Men (CHECK ELIGIBILITY LIST) - Zach Moore

13 players · average NTRP 3.78 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-12-14vs Chestnut Hill (Michael Calbert)*Won 31
L#1 SinglesVishwas Sinha vs Mitch Walters3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMauhaun Taheri / Hakim Nelson-Wilder vs Pete Sarris / Dennis Keeley7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDShawn Murphy vs Guilherme Mendes6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGabriel Buddenbrock / Dale Davis vs Michael Calbert / Milad Jabbari2-6, 6-2, 6-2
2020-07-19vs Chestnut Hill (Michael Calbert)*Won 30
W#2 DoublesAntoine Alston / Reginald Cooper vs Alex Tymchuk / Phil Laney6-7, 6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDShawn Murphy vs Michael Calbert6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDale Davis / Eric King vs Dave Worthy / Gregory Huffman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Low Men (CHECK ELIGIBILITY LIST) - Zach Moore have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Hakim Nelson-Wilder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jay Jernigan
published
Antoine Alston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Eric King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Mauhaun Taheri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Diarria Williams
published 4
3.57
DShawn Murphy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.37
Gabriel Buddenbrock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Joe Schleupner
published
Christopher Thomas
published 3.5
Dale Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Donnell Williamson
published 3.5
Vishwas Sinha
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Thomas + Diarria Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Dale Davis + Gabriel Buddenbrock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hakim Nelson-Wilder
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Jay Jernigan
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Antoine Alston
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Eric King
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mauhaun Taheri
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Diarria Williams
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
DShawn Murphy
31W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gabriel Buddenbrock
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Joe Schleupner
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Thomas
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Dale Davis
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Donnell Williamson
8W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Vishwas Sinha
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.