Teams

Larson/Kraus

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Christine Egan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Alma Siri / Katie Simpson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Kendra Rothert / Jane King Ayers7-6, 7-5
2023-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Alma Siri / Maria Siri5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Shweta Agrawal / Mai-Anh Nguyen6-3, 6-2
2023-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Lorri Asder / Pamela Meyer6-3, 6-1
2023-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Christine Egan vs Emma Scherzer / Anna Ringelberg6-4, 6-4
2023-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Nicole Norby / Manisha Thakkar3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Kraus / Sarah Larson vs Cynthia Novac-Yu / Kourtnie Katayama4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84
3
Christine Egan
52W–39L career
3%95%2%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.