Teams

BRMST GOLD

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-06vs BTA GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Ipsen / Philip Cangilla vs Michael Davidoff / John Viloria1-6, 2-6
2022-08-30vs BRMST BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Ipsen / Stephane Billat vs Joel Walter / Glenn Fleckenstein5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / David Kukafka vs Drew Carroll / Stephen Knight2-6, 4-6
2022-08-23vs BTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephane Billat / Scott Sutton vs Samuel Swift / Michael Matheson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / David Kukafka vs Marc Levinson / Zachary Baumer1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-16vs BRMST GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephane Billat / David Ipsen vs Dan Golden / John Stewart2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / Dwayne CARDOSA vs Robert Tedesco / Russell Hogan2-6
2022-08-09vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesStephane Billat / David Ipsen vs Dave Hwang / Ben Bernstein6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / Dwayne CARDOSA vs Robert Harberg / David Guan6-4, 6-2
2022-08-02vs BTA GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Ipsen / JoJo Brotamonte vs John Viloria / Parker Dodd6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Kukafka vs Johannes Steenekamp2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephane Billat / Philip Cangilla vs David Corujo / Michael Davidoff2-6, 3-6
2022-07-26vs BRMST BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesStephane Billat / Dwayne CARDOSA vs Glenn Fleckenstein / Joel Walter4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Cangilla / JoJo Brotamonte vs John Herby / Greg Tilden1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
JoJo Brotamonte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Stephane Billat
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.13
Dwayne CARDOSA
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Philip Cangilla
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
David Kukafka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
David Ipsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Cangilla + Dwayne CARDOSA2641% games+2.9% vs expected
Stephane Billat + Dwayne CARDOSA4552% games+1.8% vs expected
Stephane Billat + David Ipsen2339% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JoJo Brotamonte
50W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Stephane Billat
98W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Dwayne CARDOSA
11W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Philip Cangilla
17W–56L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
David Kukafka
25W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
David Ipsen
31W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.