Teams

Apollo Mazarick

2023 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-15vs Johnson - Mazarick 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Caesar / Deborah Baker vs LaKeshia Payton / Angie Simmons6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLydia Apollo / Heather Sisk vs KiAnna Duncan / Nicole Santiago6-0, 6-1
2023-05-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Parker / Heather Sisk vs Theresa Jones / Sandra Martin6-4, 6-2
2023-05-01vs Johnson - Mazarick 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLydia Apollo / Melissa Parker vs Michelle Elliott / LaKeshia Payton6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Sisk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Linda Caesar vs KiAnna Duncan / Beth McCue4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Caesar / Deborah Baker vs Erica Huskey / Sandra Martin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Sisk / Lydia Apollo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Caesar / Deborah Baker vs Betty Peterson / Theresa Jones6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLydia Apollo / Marcela Ovalle vs Erica Huskey / Mickey Parks6-0, 6-2
2023-03-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesLydia Apollo / Marcela Ovalle vs Beth McCue / Nicole Santiago6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Bauer Frazier / Melissa Parker vs LaKeshia Payton / Durenne Moore6-0, 6-0
2023-03-06vs Peterson - MazarickWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Caesar / Deborah Baker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Sisk / Denise Bauer Frazier vs Jillian Ballantyne / Erica Huskey6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-02-27Split 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Sisk / Karla Bullon vs LaKeshia Payton / Durenne Moore6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Michelle Elliott3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Samantha Zumwalt
published
2.79
Lydia Apollo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Linda Caesar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.70
Denise Bauer Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Heather Sisk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Karla Bullon
published
Marcela Ovalle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Sisk + Lydia Apollo5555% gamesnot enough data
Denise Bauer Frazier + Heather Sisk4446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Zumwalt
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Lydia Apollo
72W–82L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Linda Caesar
38W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Denise Bauer Frazier
64W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Heather Sisk
51W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
Karla Bullon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcela Ovalle
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.