Teams

TOC.Newsome

2022 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-20vs TOC.VeerappanWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Patrick Newsome vs Sean Heuser / Raghi Iyengar6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Anderson / Donny Joyce vs Madhusudhanarao Nelapati / Bhaswanth Chava6-2, 6-2
2022-07-15vs TOC.XuWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonny Joyce / Michael Roach vs Raymond Xu / Seth Layton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-29vs MD.CrumplerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Connor Wilkins vs Jeffrey Cox / Chris Crumpler6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonny Joyce / Daniel Martchek vs James Moriarty / Bryan Huggins7-5, 6-3
2022-06-28vs TOC.MerckWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonny Joyce / Michael Roach vs Kristofer Merck / Layton Barker6-1, 6-3
2022-06-22vs TOC.TurnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Newsome / Richard McClenny vs Cliff Ray / Cecil Turner6-0, 6-1
2022-05-25vs TOC.MorrowLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Connor Wilkins vs Aaron Hiller / Jake Wolfe3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Martchek / Paul Singh vs Bryan Simpson / Christopher Siege6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.25
Richard McClenny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Patrick Newsome
published
4.15
Daniel Martchek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Donny Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Russell Lewis
published
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
published
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Newsome + Richard McClenny9157% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Richard McClenny
432W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Patrick Newsome
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Donny Joyce
64W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
Russell Lewis
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.