Teams

BBTL50/Stark/Callawassie

Fall 50 & Over - BBTL · Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-07vs BBTL50/Kearns/Sun CityWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori McCormick / Barbara Stark vs Debbie Draper / Darcy Ozdany2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Jones / Janet Cellar vs Donna Shriner / Lori Clark1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Segally / Jennifer Withrow vs Victoria Morrison / Cath Bongiorno7-6, 6-4
2025-11-23vs BBTL50/McShane/DatawLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Stark / Sarah Jones vs Sue Davis / Jennifer Ethier3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Withrow / Patricia Manzi vs Judith Kinnard / Katheen McShane3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Segally / Laura Comes vs Emily Mahoney / Jennifer Flanagan0-6, 1-6
2025-11-16vs BBTL50/Goldenfield/HavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDonna Beer / Barbara Stark vs Donna Tambini / Myrtle Nunn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori McCormick / Jennifer Withrow vs Susan Horton / Sharon Schabel6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Diehl / Sarah Jones vs Connie Pouncy / Mary Edleson6-2, 6-2
2025-11-09vs BBTL50/Kearns/Sun CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Cellar / Barbara Stark vs Barbara Riccio / Jen Ziehl2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Meyer / Lori McCormick vs Cath Bongiorno / Susie Carpio4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Miller / Joan Segally vs Julie Hazelden / Donna Shriner3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-02vs BBTL50/McShane/DatawWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Cellar / Mary Landolfi vs Emily Mahoney / Jennifer Flanagan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori McCormick / Joan Segally vs Judith Kinnard / Katheen McShane4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Jones / Jennifer Withrow vs Arleen Cassutti / Jamie James6-4, 6-2
2025-10-26vs BBTL50/Goldenfield/HavenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Landolfi / Lori McCormick vs Adrienne Markisz / Donna Tambini3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Manzi / Janet Cellar vs Karen Goldenfield / Nancy Elrod6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Comes / Mary Miller vs Mary Edleson / Susan Horton0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-19vs BBTL50/Kearns/Sun CityLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Landolfi / Barbara Stark vs Barbara Riccio / Cath Bongiorno6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Miller / Susan Meyer vs Debbie Draper / Jennifer Woods6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Diehl / Laura Comes vs Lori Clark / Jen Ziehl0-6, 1-6
2025-10-16vs BBTL50/McShane/DatawSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Landolfi / Barbara Stark vs Emily Mahoney / Sue Davis6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLori McCormick / Joan Segally vs Tracey Ryan / Sharon Ritchie3-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs BBTL50/Goldenfield/HavenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Landolfi / Janet Cellar vs Laurie Gerber / Myrtle Nunn4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoan Segally / Sarah Jones vs Susan Horton / Penny Teague5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Manzi / Jennifer Withrow vs Karen Goldenfield / Sunday Molen6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.34
Barbara Stark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Lori McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Mary Landolfi
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Deborah Diehl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Patricia Manzi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Donna Beer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Joan Segally
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.98
Janet Cellar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jennifer Withrow
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Laura Comes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Stark + Mary Landolfi6165% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Withrow + Patricia Manzi213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Meyer + Janet Cellar213 matchesnot enough data
Joan Segally + Lori McCormick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Barbara Stark
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Lori McCormick
8W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
Mary Landolfi
16W–15L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Deborah Diehl
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Manzi
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Donna Beer
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Joan Segally
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Janet Cellar
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Jennifer Withrow
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Comes
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Meyer
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.