Teams

2023 Mixed 40&Over- Ponce Wilfredo

Mixed 40 & Over 2023 · Mixed 40&Over 7.0 FII

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#3 DoublesAngel R Nunez / Ruth Rodriguez vs Johnny Mejias / Marie Santiago7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-29vs 2023 Mixed 40&Over- Veredas SoniaWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Angel R Nunez vs Ailsa Delgado / Roberto Ramos6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Rodriguez / Israel Medina vs Jonathan Sieja / Nilda Santiago1-6, 0-3
2023-08-27vs 2023 Mixed 40&Over- Veredas SoniaWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Espinosa-Morales / Antonio Abraham-Rivera vs Amahira Lopez-Pereira / Jose Rivera-Colon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRuth Rodriguez / Angel R Nunez vs Pedro Colon / Jennifer Anderson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMERRYSHELL MORALES / Wilfredo Gonzalez vs Melisa Rivera / Juan Melendez2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40&Over 7.0 FII have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Israel Medina
published 4
3.65
Angel R Nunez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
3.62
3.30
Angela Vargas
published 3.5
3.21
Carlos Hernandez
published 3.5
3.13
2.88
Ruth Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
2.81
Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Milagros Rivera
published
Milton Pagan
published
Wilfredo Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angel R Nunez + Ruth Rodriguez1636% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Israel Medina
7W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Angel R Nunez
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Antonio Abraham-Rivera
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
Jorge Hernandez-Julia
25W–26L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Angela Vargas
38W–47L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carlos Hernandez
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Lorna Marrero-Rivera
32W–48L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Ruth Rodriguez
99W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Irmavit Rodriguez
46W–29L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Espinosa-Morales
112W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
Milagros Rivera
47W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Milton Pagan
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wilfredo Gonzalez
12W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.