Teams

WH Ballines FWL A18-4.0M

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

18 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-10-02vs MVC Schmitt FWL A18-4.0MLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndrew Leneway / Stanley Lassen III vs Andrew Chuba / David Wiltjer1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHersh Bakshi vs John Titley6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Dutton / Matthew Mingus vs Eddy Schmitt / GEORGE CHANG1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDre Ballines vs Kevin Shaw6-7, 3-1
2021-09-25vs WH Custodio FWL A18-4.0MLost 04
L#1 DoublesRick Curtis / Steve Boden vs Ryan Langejans / Marty McKenna3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Leneway / Andrew Rathbun vs Jeremy Andrick / Lin Bao0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesScott Hogan vs Metodi Ivanov4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesJoao Faria / Alexandre Georgetti vs Nicholas Gray / Robert Padgett2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Dre Ballines
usually #1 Singles 85%, also #2 Singles 15% · published 4
3.75
Nicolas Millet
published
Dale Thielbar
published 4
3.73
Charles Krug
published 4
Andrew Rathbun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrew Leneway
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Alexandre Georgetti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hersh Bakshi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Joao Faria
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justin James
published
Matthew Mingus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Hogan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stanley Lassen III
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Boden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Krug + Nicolas Millet4650% games+1.0% vs expected
Charles Krug + Dre Ballines3256% gamesnot enough data
Dale Thielbar + Nicolas Millet213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Leneway + Andrew Rathbun123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dre Ballines
104W–49L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Nicolas Millet
46W–35L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Dale Thielbar
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Charles Krug
58W–36L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Andrew Rathbun
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Leneway
36W–38L career · 10 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Alexandre Georgetti
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Hersh Bakshi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Joao Faria
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Justin James
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Mingus
42W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Dutton
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Rick Curtis
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Scott Hogan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Stanley Lassen III
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Steve Boden
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Steve Ray
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.