Teams

Baymeadows - Torres

2025 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-08vs Duval/Fricke/18&Over7.0MXDWon 10
W#1 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Eric Dawson vs Polly Curole / Andy Fricke7-6, 6-2
2025-08-01vs Julington Creek - CarrWon 10
W#2 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Gunjan Gandhi vs Mike Rhodes / Sandra Boney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-06vs Eagle Landing - BrinkLost 01
L#1 DoublesLillian Cutaj / Ricardo Torres vs Thomas Bobango / Caroline Morris2-6, 3-6
2025-05-23vs Sawgrass - WerbaWon 10
W#1 DoublesRicardo Torres / Lillian Cutaj vs Gretchen Bates / Stephen Bates6-2, 6-4
2025-05-16vs Glen Kernan - KayeWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Dawson / Kimberly Rogers vs Patricia Kozack / Mike Gregory6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlbert Delegencia / Sherry Hutzler vs Amber Kenney / Craig Kaye7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarlos Rodriguez / Mandy Riceman vs Rajiv Mirjankar / Danijela Pope6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lillian Cutaj
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Eric Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
3.29
Gunjan Gandhi
published
3.19
Svetlana Mityul
published
3.13
Albert Delegencia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Gidget Bennett
published
2.98
Sherry Hutzler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Mandy Riceman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Narong Khan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dmitri Timofeev
published
Kimberly Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ricardo Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dmitri Timofeev + Mandy Riceman5067% gamesnot enough data
Svetlana Mityul + Eric Dawson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lillian Cutaj
84W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Eric Dawson
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Maria Lourdes Salvador
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Gunjan Gandhi
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Christopher LaCouture
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Svetlana Mityul
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Albert Delegencia
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Gidget Bennett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sherry Hutzler
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Mandy Riceman
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Narong Khan
39W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Dmitri Timofeev
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Rogers
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ricardo Torres
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.