Teams

Martin

2026 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-07vs PattonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Allison Harrison vs Wynell Daniel / Carolyn Brearley4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuni Carroll / Jennifer Martin vs Neeve Owen / Margie Patton6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJenna Thomas / Caroline Parker vs Kim Shook / Karma Goodson6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2025-12-07vs PattonWon 20
W#2 DoublesCalli Davis / Jennifer Martin vs Neeve Owen / Kelly Roberts7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCaroline Parker / Hannah Laury vs Karma Goodson / Michelle Rauch6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-12-06vs PattonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Cargle / Allison Harrison vs Wynell Daniel / Carolyn Brearley4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCalli Davis / Suni Carroll vs Neeve Owen / Kelly Roberts3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJenna Thomas / Hannah Laury vs Karma Goodson / Michelle Rauch6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Allison Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Calli Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Caroline Barr
published 4
3.78
Suni Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Jenna Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Ashlyn Thornton
published 3.5
3.37
Hannah Laury
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suni Carroll + Jenna Thomas8168% gamesnot enough data
Calli Davis + Hannah Laury4163% gamesnot enough data
Ashlyn Thornton + Calli Davis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Harrison
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
4.43
4
Calli Davis
62W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Caroline Barr
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Suni Carroll
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
Jenna Thomas
60W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Ashlyn Thornton
87W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Hannah Laury
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.