Teams

7-APerry-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-07vs 8-ADavies-CHCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesKalista Popp / Colleen Starns vs Courtney Whilden / Adrian Davies1-6, 0-6
2024-10-03vs 5-NDolan-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Kelly Swisher vs Marie-Louise Russ / Kim Cabelka0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaitlin Keller / Colleen Starns vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey / Constanza de Radcliffe1-6, 1-6
2024-09-23vs 6-DBaker-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesColleen Starns / Kelly Jernigan vs Sara Knechtel / Kerry Espinola0-6, 1-6
2024-09-03vs 4-LDubois-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelaine Young / Colleen Starns vs Laura Cannon / Kellyn Kropinak4-6, 1-6
2024-08-26vs 3-LKulp-EPHLost 02
L#1 DoublesTana Byrum / Colleen Starns vs Lauren Kulp / Lori Salzmann0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Patulski / Anna Jessup vs Delisa Ordronneau / Katy McReynolds1-6, 2-6
2024-08-12vs 1-SStowe-SVCLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Jennifer Harrell vs Laura Caldwell / Sandra Stowe3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Behan / Colleen Starns vs Barbara Correal / Haley Transou Terry0-6, 0-6
2024-08-05vs 2-JFaubert-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Swisher / Emily Patulski vs Kim McWhorter / Lora Alkhawam1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Lucas / Colleen Starns vs Belen Diaz Cisneros / Barbie McGarrah2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Emily Patulski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.48
Colleen Starns
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.41
Ashley Perry
published 2.5
2.27
Maria Behan
published
2.12
Dina Ciresa
published
2.00
Anna Jessup
published 2.5
1.96
Melaine Young
published
1.91
Anne Lucas
published 2.5
Kelly Swisher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Emily Patulski
39W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%29%71%
2.58
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%55%45%
2.48
2.5
Ashley Perry
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.41
Maria Behan
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Dina Ciresa
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Anna Jessup
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Melaine Young
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Anne Lucas
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Kelly Swisher
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.